FLTMX vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
FLTMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 15, 1977. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.
Performance
FLTMX vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLTMX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTMX Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund | -0.73% | 6.02% | 1.19% | 5.52% | -6.92% | 0.83% | 4.36% | 6.34% | 1.89% | 4.50% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.09% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTMX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTMX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 2.10%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.68% annualized return.
FLTMX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
BND
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLTMX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTMX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLTMX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
FLTMX
BND
FLTMX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLTMX | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 0.93 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 1.32 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.16 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 1.75 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 4.78 | +0.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLTMX | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 0.93 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.04 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.30 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.59 | +0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTMX and BND is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLTMX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
FLTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than BND's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTMX Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund | 2.85% | 3.70% | 2.47% | 2.42% | 1.36% | 1.67% | 2.00% | 2.39% | 3.31% | 2.64% | 3.20% | 2.36% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.93% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
FLTMX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTMX drawdown since its inception was -16.13%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTMX and BND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTMX | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.13% | -18.58% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.56% | -2.44% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.91% | -17.91% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.91% | -18.58% | +7.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -2.54% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -3.07% | +1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.90% | +0.03% |
Volatility
FLTMX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income Fund (FLTMX) is 1.03%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.63%. This indicates that FLTMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLTMX | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 1.63% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.56% | 2.52% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71% | 4.30% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.02% | 6.00% | -2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.22% | 5.52% | -2.30% |