FLTB vs. SPY
FLTB (Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLTB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. FLTB is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FLTB returned 2.44%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for SPY. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLTB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
FLTB vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTB achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTB has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 2.44%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return.
FLTB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- 2.44%
SPY
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
FLTB vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTB Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF | 0.84% | 6.60% | 5.14% | 5.94% | -5.88% | -1.20% | 5.57% | 5.87% | 1.06% | 2.10% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.15% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTB and SPY is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014 | 0.07 |
The correlation between FLTB and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLTB vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
FLTB
SPY
FLTB vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLTB | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.67 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.14 | 11.92 | -0.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLTB vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTB drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTB and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTB | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -55.19% | +45.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.52% | -8.88% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.52% | -18.76% | +17.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.26% | -24.50% | +15.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.37% | -33.72% | +24.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -3.17% | +2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -9.04% | +7.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 1.98% | -1.62% |
Volatility
FLTB vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) is 0.57%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that FLTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLTB | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | 4.87% | -4.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.66% | 9.85% | -8.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10% | 12.50% | -10.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.81% | 17.15% | -14.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 17.95% | -15.01% |
FLTB vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLTB vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
FLTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than SPY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTB Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF | 4.36% | 4.31% | 4.11% | 3.20% | 1.63% | 0.89% | 1.56% | 2.67% | 2.50% | 1.78% | 1.59% | 1.63% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLTB and SPY have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to FLTB (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTB dropped -9.37% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.53% vs 2.44% for FLTB. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLTB has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 2.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLTB.
FLTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 1.03% for SPY.
FLTB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLTB and 0.09% for SPY.
FLTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLTB and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer