FLSP vs. DBMF
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF).
FLSP and DBMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLSP is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 18, 2019. DBMF is an actively managed fund by Litman Gregory Capital Partners LLC. It was launched on May 8, 2019.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLSP or DBMF.
Key characteristics
| FLSP | DBMF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.03% | 7.63% |
| 1Y Return | 8.95% | 1.03% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.46% | 5.33% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.72 | 0.10 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.14 | 0.21 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 1.03 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.65 | 0.06 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.01 | 0.20 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.51% | 5.58% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.03% | 11.35% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.75% | -20.39% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.20% | -11.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLSP and DBMF is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FLSP vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FLSP achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 7.63% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLSP vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLSP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLSP vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLSP vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
FLSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than DBMF's 5.21% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF | 1.05% | 1.19% | 2.18% | 1.20% | 8.08% | 0.02% |
DBMF iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.21% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% |
Drawdowns
FLSP vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLSP drawdown since its inception was -22.75%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSP and DBMF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLSP vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.36%. This indicates that FLSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.