FLSA vs. SCHX
FLSA (Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLSA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Saudi Arabia RIC Capped Index, while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLSA returned 2.65%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for SCHX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLSA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
FLSA vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLSA achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 10.72% return.
FLSA
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 0.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.65%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
FLSA vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSA Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF | 5.04% | -7.15% | -0.29% | 12.99% | -3.58% | 35.72% | 3.73% | 9.46% | 2.95% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.72% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLSA and SCHX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2018 | 0.38 |
FLSA vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLSA
SCHX
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
FLSA
SCHX
Basic Materials
FLSA
SCHX
Energy
FLSA
SCHX
Communication Services
FLSA
SCHX
Utilities
FLSA
SCHX
Industrials
FLSA
SCHX
Healthcare
FLSA
SCHX
Real Estate
FLSA
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
FLSA
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
FLSA
SCHX
Technology
FLSA
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLSA vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
FLSA
SCHX
FLSA vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLSA | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 2.29 | -2.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 3.14 | -2.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.41 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 3.05 | -2.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | 13.85 | -13.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLSA | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 2.29 | -2.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.78 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.85 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
FLSA vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLSA drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSA and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLSA | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.31% | -34.33% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | -9.02% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -19.04% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.25% | -25.41% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.86% | -0.70% | -15.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.20% | -3.97% | -8.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.03% | 1.98% | +3.05% |
Volatility
FLSA vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF (FLSA) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 2.91%. This indicates that FLSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLSA | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 2.91% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.08% | 9.02% | +3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 11.99% | +4.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 17.12% | -1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 18.15% | +1.26% |
FLSA vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLSA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLSA vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
FLSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than SCHX's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSA Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF | 3.82% | 4.01% | 3.01% | 3.09% | 1.90% | 1.95% | 2.16% | 3.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLSA and SCHX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLSA has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to SCHX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSA dropped -38.31% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 13.29% vs 2.65% for FLSA. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 13.29% return vs 2.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FLSA.
FLSA has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 1.01% for SCHX.
FLSA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. FLSA tracks FTSE Saudi Arabia RIC Capped Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FLSA and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLSA and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer