FLRT vs. BSJP
FLRT (Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF) and BSJP (Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLRT is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Pacer, while BSJP is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index. FLRT is actively managed, while BSJP is passively managed. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLRT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJP.
Performance
FLRT vs. BSJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLRT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 7.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.48%
BSJP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.79M | $4.57M | $4.68M |
FLRT vs. BSJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 2.44% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 14.59% | -2.72% | 3.18% | 2.78% | 9.44% | -1.14% | 0.43% |
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 4.46% | 8.07% | 10.41% | -5.16% | 4.57% | 4.16% | 16.89% | -4.66% | 0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLRT and BSJP is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017 | 0.19 |
The correlation between FLRT and BSJP shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLRT vs. BSJP — Risk / Return Rank
FLRT
BSJP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLRT vs. BSJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLRT | BSJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.76 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.63 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLRT vs. BSJP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLRT | BSJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.48% | — | — |
Volatility
FLRT vs. BSJP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLRT | BSJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.30% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.09% | — | — |
FLRT vs. BSJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLRT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJP's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLRT vs. BSJP - Dividend Comparison
FLRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, more than BSJP's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.52% | 4.50% | 6.25% | 7.07% | 5.37% | 4.27% | 4.96% | 5.49% | 5.84% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 6.71% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLRT and BSJP have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSJP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSJP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FLRT.
FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.71%, compared with 1.52% for BSJP.
FLRT is categorized as Bank Loan, while BSJP is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FLRT and 0.42% for BSJP.
Find the right allocation for FLRT and BSJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer