PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLRN vs. SPTS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLRN and SPTS is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.0

Performance

FLRN vs. SPTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
32.93%
16.18%
FLRN
SPTS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLRN:

7.67

SPTS:

2.26

Sortino Ratio

FLRN:

14.50

SPTS:

3.41

Omega Ratio

FLRN:

4.40

SPTS:

1.45

Calmar Ratio

FLRN:

14.31

SPTS:

4.20

Martin Ratio

FLRN:

178.87

SPTS:

10.45

Ulcer Index

FLRN:

0.04%

SPTS:

0.38%

Daily Std Dev

FLRN:

0.85%

SPTS:

1.78%

Max Drawdown

FLRN:

-14.64%

SPTS:

-5.83%

Current Drawdown

FLRN:

0.00%

SPTS:

-0.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRN achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly higher than SPTS's 3.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FLRN has outperformed SPTS with an annualized return of 2.43%, while SPTS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.37% annualized return.


FLRN

YTD

6.18%

1M

0.44%

6M

2.87%

1Y

6.42%

5Y*

3.01%

10Y*

2.43%

SPTS

YTD

3.81%

1M

0.41%

6M

2.61%

1Y

3.95%

5Y*

1.33%

10Y*

1.37%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLRN vs. SPTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTS's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
Expense ratio chart for FLRN: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for SPTS: current value at 0.06% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.06%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLRN vs. SPTS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 7.67, compared to the broader market0.002.004.007.672.26
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 14.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0014.503.41
The chart of Omega ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 4.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.004.401.45
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 14.31, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0014.314.20
The chart of Martin ratio for FLRN, currently valued at 178.87, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00178.8710.45
FLRN
SPTS

The current FLRN Sharpe Ratio is 7.67, which is higher than the SPTS Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRN and SPTS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.004.006.008.0010.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.67
2.26
FLRN
SPTS

Dividends

FLRN vs. SPTS - Dividend Comparison

FLRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than SPTS's 4.26% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
5.68%5.68%1.95%0.40%1.22%2.76%2.39%1.63%1.06%0.63%0.53%0.72%
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
4.26%3.61%1.26%0.20%0.71%2.21%2.04%1.20%0.95%0.83%0.68%0.43%

Drawdowns

FLRN vs. SPTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRN drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, which is greater than SPTS's maximum drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRN and SPTS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-1.00%-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember0
-0.45%
FLRN
SPTS

Volatility

FLRN vs. SPTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) is 0.20%, while SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) has a volatility of 0.39%. This indicates that FLRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.10%0.20%0.30%0.40%0.50%0.60%0.70%0.80%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.20%
0.39%
FLRN
SPTS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab