PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRG vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLRG vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRG achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 37.85% return.


FLRG

1D
0.15%
1M
3.94%
YTD
9.53%
6M
9.67%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*

XLK

1D
1.25%
1M
22.45%
YTD
37.85%
6M
37.41%
1Y
71.15%
3Y*
34.35%
5Y*
24.55%
10Y*
25.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRG vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLRG
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
9.53%13.92%23.36%18.31%-10.98%29.36%9.53%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
37.85%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%14.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRG and XLK is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020

0.83

The correlation between FLRG and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLRG vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLRG
XLK

Technology

34.7%
99.7%

Financial Services

12.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%

-

Communication Services

10.3%

-

Healthcare

9.2%

-

Industrials

7.7%
0.1%

Energy

4.8%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Basic Materials

2.5%

-

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Utilities

1.2%

-

Technology

FLRG
34.7%
XLK
99.7%

Financial Services

FLRG
12.3%
XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

FLRG
10.7%
XLK

-

Communication Services

FLRG
10.3%
XLK

-

Healthcare

FLRG
9.2%
XLK

-

Industrials

FLRG
7.7%
XLK
0.1%

Energy

FLRG
4.8%
XLK
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

FLRG
4.6%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

FLRG
2.5%
XLK

-

Real Estate

FLRG
2.1%
XLK

-

Utilities

FLRG
1.2%
XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLRG vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRG
FLRG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FLRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRG Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRG vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLRGXLKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.98

3.44

-1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.81

4.12

-1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.55

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

4.56

-1.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.31

15.32

-4.02

FLRG vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRG and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLRGXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

3.44

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.99

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.42

+0.63

Drawdowns

FLRG vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRG and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRGXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-82.05%

+62.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-15.92%

+8.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

-25.66%

+9.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.64%

-33.56%

+13.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-34.96%

+31.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

4.74%

-2.93%

Volatility

FLRG vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) is 2.44%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that FLRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLRGXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

6.74%

-4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

16.64%

-9.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

20.80%

-10.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

24.90%

-9.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

24.49%

-9.47%

FLRG vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLRG vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

FLRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRG
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.34%1.42%1.42%1.39%1.62%1.36%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLRG and XLK have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to FLRG (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRG dropped -19.64% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 24.55% vs 13.32% for FLRG. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FLRG has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 24.55% return vs 13.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLRG.

FLRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.39% for XLK.

FLRG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. FLRG tracks Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLRG and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLRG and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer