FLRG vs. QQQ
FLRG (Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLRG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLRG returned 13.32%/yr vs 18.43%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLRG charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
FLRG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLRG achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return.
FLRG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- 19.94%
- 3Y*
- 19.62%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
FLRG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF | 9.53% | 13.92% | 23.36% | 18.31% | -10.98% | 29.36% | 9.53% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.62% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 16.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLRG and QQQ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FLRG and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLRG vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLRG
QQQ
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
FLRG
QQQ
Financial Services
FLRG
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
FLRG
QQQ
Communication Services
FLRG
QQQ
Healthcare
FLRG
QQQ
Industrials
FLRG
QQQ
Energy
FLRG
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
FLRG
QQQ
Basic Materials
FLRG
QQQ
Real Estate
FLRG
QQQ
Utilities
FLRG
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLRG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
FLRG
QQQ
FLRG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLRG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 2.73 | -0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.81 | 3.55 | -0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.47 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 3.71 | -0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.31 | 14.30 | -2.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLRG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.73 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.83 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.41 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
FLRG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLRG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRG and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLRG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.64% | -82.97% | +63.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.16% | -11.96% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -22.77% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.64% | -35.12% | +15.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -32.79% | +29.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 3.11% | -1.30% |
Volatility
FLRG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) is 2.44%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that FLRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLRG | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | 4.48% | -2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 12.11% | -4.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 15.95% | -5.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 22.39% | -7.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 22.30% | -7.28% |
FLRG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLRG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLRG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
FLRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF | 1.34% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 1.39% | 1.62% | 1.36% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLRG and QQQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to FLRG (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRG dropped -19.64% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 18.43% vs 13.32% for FLRG. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FLRG has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 18.43% return vs 13.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLRG.
FLRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
FLRG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. FLRG tracks Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLRG and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLRG and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer