PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLR vs. EPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLR vs. EPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fluor Corporation (FLR) and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLR achieves a 26.60% return, which is significantly higher than EPD's 24.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FLR has underperformed EPD with an annualized return of 0.32%, while EPD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.14% annualized return.


FLR

1D
0.20%
1M
1.46%
6M
8.62%
YTD
26.60%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
24.67%
10Y*
0.32%
ALL TIME*
7.43%

EPD

1D
1.30%
1M
5.08%
6M
18.03%
YTD
24.19%
1Y
31.80%
3Y*
20.49%
5Y*
19.17%
10Y*
11.14%
ALL TIME*
14.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$138.15M$120.42M$128.94M
$115.98M$99.61M$134.46M

FLR vs. EPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLR
Fluor Corporation
26.60%-19.65%25.91%13.01%39.93%55.10%-14.55%-39.54%-36.61%0.15%
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
24.19%9.45%28.00%17.71%18.32%21.40%-23.61%21.88%-1.32%4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FLR and EPD is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2000

0.32

The correlation between FLR and EPD shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLR:

$7.01B

EPD:

$82.32B

EPS

FLR:

$2.98

EPD:

$2.69

PE Ratio

FLR:

16.82

EPD:

14.12

PEG Ratio

FLR:

0.03

EPD:

2.27

PS Ratio

FLR:

0.39

EPD:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLR:

$15.19B

EPD:

$51.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLR:

-$247.00M

EPD:

$7.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

FLR:

-$276.00M

EPD:

$10.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLR vs. EPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLR
FLR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLR Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

EPD
EPD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
EPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPD Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLR vs. EPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fluor Corporation (FLR) and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLREPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.32

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

3.31

-3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

9.32

-10.40

FLR vs. EPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLR Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the EPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLR and EPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLR vs. EPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLR drawdown since its inception was -95.89%, which is greater than EPD's maximum drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLR and EPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLREPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.89%

-58.78%

-37.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.88%

-9.32%

-12.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.63%

-15.40%

-32.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.63%

-18.06%

-29.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.16%

-58.04%

-36.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.30%

-2.97%

-36.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.60%

-10.20%

-31.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.87%

3.31%

+16.56%

Volatility

FLR vs. EPD - Volatility Comparison

Fluor Corporation (FLR) has a higher volatility of 14.61% compared to Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) at 6.07%. This indicates that FLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLREPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.61%

6.07%

+8.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.22%

14.84%

+21.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.86%

17.06%

+35.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.13%

17.20%

+27.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.81%

24.11%

+33.70%

Dividends

FLR vs. EPD - Dividend Comparison

FLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
5.80%6.74%6.63%7.51%7.79%8.20%9.09%6.23%6.97%6.29%5.88%5.90%
FLR
Fluor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.63%3.87%2.61%1.63%1.60%1.78%

Financials

FLR vs. EPD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fluor Corporation and Enterprise Products Partners L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

FLR vs. EPD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fluor Corporation and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

FLR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a gross profit of 13.00M and revenue of 3.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.4%.

EPD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 1.88B and revenue of 14.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.1%.

FLR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fluor Corporation reported an operating income of 92.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.

EPD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 1.82B and revenue of 14.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.

FLR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a net income of 160.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.

EPD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported a net income of 1.48B and revenue of 14.39B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FLR and EPD have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLR has higher volatility (14.61%) compared to EPD (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLR dropped -95.89% vs EPD's -58.78%.

EPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLR and EPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer