FLOT vs. TLT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT).
FLOT and TLT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLOT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). It was launched on Jun 14, 2011. TLT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Bond Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002. Both FLOT and TLT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLOT or TLT.
Key characteristics
| FLOT | TLT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.72% | -5.24% |
| 1Y Return | 6.63% | 7.41% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.44% | -12.32% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.99% | -5.76% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.33% | -0.27% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 8.14 | 0.48 |
| Sortino Ratio | 14.93 | 0.77 |
| Omega Ratio | 4.54 | 1.09 |
| Calmar Ratio | 14.92 | 0.16 |
| Martin Ratio | 161.37 | 1.18 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.04% | 6.06% |
| Daily Std Dev | 0.81% | 14.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.54% | -48.35% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -40.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOT and TLT is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
FLOT vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FLOT achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -5.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FLOT has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 2.33%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -0.27% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLOT vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLOT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLOT vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLOT vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than TLT's 4.06% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 5.92% | 5.66% | 2.06% | 0.43% | 1.25% | 2.78% | 2.41% | 1.45% | 0.97% | 0.53% | 0.44% | 0.48% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.06% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% | 2.67% | 3.26% |
Drawdowns
FLOT vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOT drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT and TLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLOT vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) is 0.41%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that FLOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.