PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLOT vs. FALN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FLOTFALN
YTD Return5.64%8.24%
1Y Return6.61%14.78%
3Y Return (Ann)4.42%1.75%
5Y Return (Ann)2.98%5.63%
Sharpe Ratio8.163.05
Sortino Ratio14.944.69
Omega Ratio4.581.60
Calmar Ratio14.931.69
Martin Ratio161.4521.66
Ulcer Index0.04%0.69%
Daily Std Dev0.81%4.93%
Max Drawdown-13.54%-29.22%
Current Drawdown-0.02%-0.03%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between FLOT and FALN is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FLOT vs. FALN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FLOT achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly lower than FALN's 8.24% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.88%
5.66%
FLOT
FALN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLOT vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLOT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for FALN: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for FLOT: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLOT vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLOT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLOT, currently valued at 8.16, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.008.16
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLOT, currently valued at 14.94, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.94
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLOT, currently valued at 4.58, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.004.58
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLOT, currently valued at 14.93, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0014.93
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLOT, currently valued at 161.45, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00161.45
FALN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FALN, currently valued at 3.05, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.05
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FALN, currently valued at 4.69, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.69
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FALN, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.60
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FALN, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.69
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FALN, currently valued at 21.66, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0021.66

FLOT vs. FALN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOT Sharpe Ratio is 8.16, which is higher than the FALN Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOT and FALN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.004.006.008.0010.0012.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.16
3.05
FLOT
FALN

Dividends

FLOT vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison

FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than FALN's 6.06% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
5.92%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.45%0.97%0.53%0.44%0.48%
FALN
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
6.06%5.38%5.08%3.39%5.14%5.35%5.97%6.99%3.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLOT vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOT drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, smaller than the maximum FALN drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT and FALN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.02%
-0.03%
FLOT
FALN

Volatility

FLOT vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) is 0.41%, while iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that FLOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FALN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.41%
1.35%
FLOT
FALN