FLOA.L vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
FLOA.L and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLOA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. It was launched on Mar 20, 2018. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both FLOA.L and VT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLOA.L or VT.
Key characteristics
| FLOA.L | VT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.74% | 9.76% |
| 1Y Return | 7.00% | 22.75% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.57% | 5.93% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.76% | 11.36% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 8.35 | 2.03 |
| Daily Std Dev | 0.85% | 11.52% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.96% | -50.27% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.02% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOA.L and VT is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FLOA.L vs. VT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FLOA.L achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 9.76% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLOA.L vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLOA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLOA.L vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLOA.L vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
FLOA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOA.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 2.03% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.44% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
FLOA.L vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOA.L drawdown since its inception was -14.96%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOA.L and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLOA.L vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) is 0.23%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.17%. This indicates that FLOA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.