PortfoliosLab logo
FLO vs. STAG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FLO and STAG is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FLO vs. STAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLO:

-1.42

STAG:

0.05

Sortino Ratio

FLO:

-1.92

STAG:

0.26

Omega Ratio

FLO:

0.78

STAG:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

FLO:

-0.76

STAG:

0.06

Martin Ratio

FLO:

-1.72

STAG:

0.17

Ulcer Index

FLO:

16.42%

STAG:

10.35%

Daily Std Dev

FLO:

20.76%

STAG:

23.52%

Max Drawdown

FLO:

-83.49%

STAG:

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

FLO:

-37.35%

STAG:

-17.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLO:

$3.63B

STAG:

$6.60B

EPS

FLO:

$1.17

STAG:

$1.33

PE Ratio

FLO:

14.71

STAG:

26.02

PEG Ratio

FLO:

14.76

STAG:

-402.43

PS Ratio

FLO:

0.71

STAG:

8.22

PB Ratio

FLO:

2.60

STAG:

1.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLO:

$3.53B

STAG:

$785.42M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLO:

$1.75B

STAG:

$550.70M

EBITDA (TTM)

FLO:

$369.82M

STAG:

$538.17M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLO achieves a -15.63% return, which is significantly lower than STAG's 3.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FLO has underperformed STAG with an annualized return of 0.69%, while STAG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.29% annualized return.


FLO

YTD

-15.63%

1M

-5.44%

6M

-17.83%

1Y

-29.25%

5Y*

-1.59%

10Y*

0.69%

STAG

YTD

3.82%

1M

12.43%

6M

-5.41%

1Y

1.80%

5Y*

10.70%

10Y*

10.29%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLO vs. STAG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLO is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLO is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLO is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLO is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLO is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLO is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

STAG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of STAG is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of STAG is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of STAG is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of STAG is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of STAG is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of STAG is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLO vs. STAG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLO Sharpe Ratio is -1.42, which is lower than the STAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLO and STAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FLO vs. STAG - Dividend Comparison

FLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, more than STAG's 4.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLO
Flowers Foods, Inc.
5.58%4.60%4.04%3.10%3.02%3.49%3.45%3.84%3.47%3.13%2.64%2.53%
STAG
STAG Industrial, Inc.
4.29%4.38%3.74%4.52%3.02%4.60%4.53%5.71%5.14%5.82%7.40%5.27%

Drawdowns

FLO vs. STAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLO drawdown since its inception was -83.49%, which is greater than STAG's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLO and STAG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FLO vs. STAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) is 5.81%, while STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that FLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FLO vs. STAG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flowers Foods, Inc. and STAG Industrial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20212022202320242025
1.11B
205.57M
(FLO) Total Revenue
(STAG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FLO vs. STAG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Flowers Foods, Inc. and STAG Industrial, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
48.8%
78.8%
(FLO) Gross Margin
(STAG) Gross Margin
FLO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 542.66M and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.8%.

STAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, STAG Industrial, Inc. reported a gross profit of 161.90M and revenue of 205.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.

FLO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.35M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.5%.

STAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, STAG Industrial, Inc. reported an operating income of 74.69M and revenue of 205.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.3%.

FLO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported a net income of 43.12M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.

STAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, STAG Industrial, Inc. reported a net income of 91.40M and revenue of 205.57M, resulting in a net margin of 44.5%.