FLO vs. MA
FLO (Flowers Foods, Inc.) and MA (Mastercard Incorporated) are both stocks. FLO operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while MA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, FLO returned -5.21%/yr vs 17.95%/yr for MA. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLO vs. MA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLO achieves a -31.34% return, which is significantly lower than MA's -17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FLO has underperformed MA with an annualized return of -5.21%, while MA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.95% annualized return.
FLO
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -12.93%
- YTD
- -31.34%
- 6M
- -32.52%
- 1Y
- -52.84%
- 3Y*
- -30.35%
- 5Y*
- -18.29%
- 10Y*
- -5.21%
MA
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -6.58%
- YTD
- -17.13%
- 6M
- -14.57%
- 1Y
- -18.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- 17.95%
FLO vs. MA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLO Flowers Foods, Inc. | -31.34% | -43.63% | -4.34% | -18.63% | 7.97% | 25.63% | 7.73% | 21.80% | -0.93% | 0.22% |
MA Mastercard Incorporated | -17.13% | 9.04% | 24.17% | 23.40% | -2.66% | 1.16% | 20.19% | 59.16% | 25.31% | 47.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLO and MA is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2006 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
FLO:
$1.55B
MA:
$421.09B
FLO:
$0.66
MA:
$17.28
FLO:
11.00
MA:
27.30
FLO:
0.62
MA:
12.52
FLO:
1.19
MA:
62.64
FLO:
$2.47B
MA:
$33.94B
FLO:
$1.19B
MA:
$26.70B
FLO:
$289.47M
MA:
$21.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLO vs. MA — Risk / Return Rank
FLO
MA
FLO vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLO | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.69 | 0.87 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | -0.89 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.66 | -1.84 | +0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLO | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.54 | -0.84 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.74 | 0.24 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.21 | 0.67 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.83 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
FLO vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLO drawdown since its inception was -72.29%, which is greater than MA's maximum drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLO and MA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLO | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.29% | -62.67% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.34% | -20.91% | -34.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.82% | -20.91% | -47.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.29% | -28.25% | -44.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.29% | -41.00% | -31.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.27% | -20.91% | -50.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.59% | -9.82% | -10.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.77% | 10.06% | +21.71% |
Volatility
FLO vs. MA - Volatility Comparison
Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) has a higher volatility of 16.64% compared to Mastercard Incorporated (MA) at 5.95%. This indicates that FLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLO | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.64% | 5.95% | +10.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.69% | 17.27% | +11.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.42% | 22.03% | +12.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.71% | 23.96% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.10% | 26.91% | -1.81% |
Dividends
FLO vs. MA - Dividend Comparison
FLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.62%, more than MA's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLO Flowers Foods, Inc. | 13.62% | 9.03% | 4.60% | 4.04% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.49% | 3.45% | 3.84% | 3.47% | 3.13% | 2.64% |
MA Mastercard Incorporated | 0.69% | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.56% | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.74% | 0.66% |
Financials
FLO vs. MA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flowers Foods, Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLO vs. MA - Profitability Comparison
FLO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of -559.92M and revenue of -1.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.4%.
MA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.
FLO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -69.09M and revenue of -1.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.
MA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.
FLO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flowers Foods, Inc. reported a net income of 109.13M and revenue of -1.23B, resulting in a net margin of -8.9%.
MA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLO and MA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLO has higher volatility (16.64%) compared to MA (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLO dropped -72.29% vs MA's -62.67%.
MA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.84 vs -1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLO and MA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer