PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLNT vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLNT vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fluent, Inc. (FLNT) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLNT achieves a 35.00% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 7.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FLNT has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -18.79%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.91% annualized return.


FLNT

1D
-3.57%
1M
35.56%
YTD
35.00%
6M
31.17%
1Y
77.05%
3Y*
-4.50%
5Y*
-28.60%
10Y*
-18.79%

^GSPC

1D
-0.01%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
7.48%
6M
6.14%
1Y
20.77%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
13.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLNT vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLNT
Fluent, Inc.
35.00%-4.76%-37.31%-38.53%-45.23%-62.52%112.40%-30.56%-18.18%27.54%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.48%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FLNT and ^GSPC is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.19

The correlation between FLNT and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Fluent, Inc.

S&P 500 Index

Return for Risk

FLNT vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLNT
FLNT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FLNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLNT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FLNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLNT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLNT vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fluent, Inc. (FLNT) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLNT^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

2.29

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.99

10.09

-6.10

FLNT vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLNT and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLNT vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLNT drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLNT and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLNT^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.42%

-56.78%

-42.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.60%

-9.10%

-39.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.74%

-18.90%

-46.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.33%

-25.43%

-65.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.67%

-33.92%

-62.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.79%

-3.32%

-95.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.78%

-10.71%

-69.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.37%

2.06%

+17.31%

Volatility

FLNT vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Fluent, Inc. (FLNT) has a higher volatility of 34.63% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.82%. This indicates that FLNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLNT^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.63%

4.82%

+29.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.80%

9.88%

+51.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.22%

12.50%

+71.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.94%

17.00%

+58.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.31%

18.07%

+62.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLNT and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLNT has higher volatility (34.63%) compared to ^GSPC (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLNT dropped -99.42% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLNT and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer