PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLNC vs. MA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FLNC and MA is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

FLNC vs. MA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and Mastercard Inc (MA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-59.46%
63.30%
FLNC
MA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLNC:

-0.47

MA:

1.37

Sortino Ratio

FLNC:

-0.29

MA:

1.90

Omega Ratio

FLNC:

0.97

MA:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

FLNC:

-0.54

MA:

1.88

Martin Ratio

FLNC:

-1.30

MA:

4.61

Ulcer Index

FLNC:

26.83%

MA:

4.84%

Daily Std Dev

FLNC:

73.72%

MA:

16.27%

Max Drawdown

FLNC:

-83.22%

MA:

-62.67%

Current Drawdown

FLNC:

-62.27%

MA:

-0.35%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLNC:

$2.41B

MA:

$489.65B

EPS

FLNC:

$0.13

MA:

$13.25

PE Ratio

FLNC:

102.54

MA:

40.26

PEG Ratio

FLNC:

3.14

MA:

2.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLNC:

$2.33B

MA:

$20.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLNC:

$304.69M

MA:

$18.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

FLNC:

$67.59M

MA:

$12.55B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLNC achieves a -10.64% return, which is significantly lower than MA's 1.47% return.


FLNC

YTD

-10.64%

1M

-10.19%

6M

-13.32%

1Y

-29.47%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MA

YTD

1.47%

1M

-0.35%

6M

22.10%

1Y

22.35%

5Y*

11.72%

10Y*

21.59%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLNC vs. MA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLNC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLNC is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLNC is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLNC is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLNC is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLNC is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLNC is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MA is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MA is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MA is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MA is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MA is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MA is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLNC vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and Mastercard Inc (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLNC, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.471.37
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLNC, currently valued at -0.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.291.90
The chart of Omega ratio for FLNC, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.971.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLNC, currently valued at -0.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.541.88
The chart of Martin ratio for FLNC, currently valued at -1.30, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.304.61
FLNC
MA

The current FLNC Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the MA Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLNC and MA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.47
1.37
FLNC
MA

Dividends

FLNC vs. MA - Dividend Comparison

FLNC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLNC
Fluence Energy, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MA
Mastercard Inc
0.51%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%0.51%

Drawdowns

FLNC vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLNC drawdown since its inception was -83.22%, which is greater than MA's maximum drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLNC and MA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-62.27%
-0.35%
FLNC
MA

Volatility

FLNC vs. MA - Volatility Comparison

Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) has a higher volatility of 17.80% compared to Mastercard Inc (MA) at 4.91%. This indicates that FLNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
17.80%
4.91%
FLNC
MA

Financials

FLNC vs. MA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fluence Energy, Inc. and Mastercard Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab