PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLN vs. DAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLN vs. DAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLN achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly higher than DAX's -1.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLN having a 9.42% annualized return and DAX not far ahead at 9.68%.


FLN

1D
-0.88%
1M
-3.24%
YTD
10.73%
6M
11.01%
1Y
33.80%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
9.42%

DAX

1D
-1.06%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
-1.81%
6M
-1.55%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLN vs. DAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLN
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund
10.73%55.05%-23.10%29.68%2.73%-6.94%-12.27%27.22%-8.31%21.54%
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
-1.81%39.00%10.55%23.62%-18.47%7.73%12.27%22.11%-22.92%28.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FLN and DAX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014

0.45

The correlation between FLN and DAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLN vs. DAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLN
DAX

Financial Services

23.6%
20.0%

Utilities

16.2%
4.5%

Basic Materials

12.9%
5.0%

Industrials

12.5%
34.1%

Energy

9.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
1.0%

Communication Services

6.6%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
7.3%

Real Estate

5.1%
0.9%

Technology

2.1%
15.4%

Healthcare

0.6%
5.5%

Financial Services

FLN
23.6%
DAX
20.0%

Utilities

FLN
16.2%
DAX
4.5%

Basic Materials

FLN
12.9%
DAX
5.0%

Industrials

FLN
12.5%
DAX
34.1%

Energy

FLN
9.4%
DAX

-

Consumer Defensive

FLN
7.8%
DAX
1.0%

Communication Services

FLN
6.6%
DAX
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FLN
5.4%
DAX
7.3%

Real Estate

FLN
5.1%
DAX
0.9%

Technology

FLN
2.1%
DAX
15.4%

Healthcare

FLN
0.6%
DAX
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLN vs. DAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLN
FLN Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLN Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLN Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

DAX
DAX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLN vs. DAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLNDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.05

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

0.26

+2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.24

0.80

+6.44

FLN vs. DAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the DAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLN and DAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLN vs. DAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLN drawdown since its inception was -57.95%, which is greater than DAX's maximum drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLN and DAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLNDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.95%

-45.58%

-12.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-14.82%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.23%

-16.03%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.95%

-38.92%

+12.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.75%

-45.58%

-12.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.75%

-5.73%

-5.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.87%

-10.48%

-8.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

4.82%

-0.14%

Volatility

FLN vs. DAX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) at 5.25%. This indicates that FLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLNDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

5.25%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.90%

14.86%

+3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.31%

17.98%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.65%

20.43%

+2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.57%

20.98%

+6.59%

FLN vs. DAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DAX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLN vs. DAX - Dividend Comparison

FLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than DAX's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
1.50%1.47%2.24%2.48%2.80%2.65%2.25%2.47%3.33%1.73%1.78%1.41%
FLN
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund
3.62%3.40%6.26%4.17%5.57%4.70%1.64%1.91%3.08%10.28%1.06%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLN and DAX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLN has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to DAX (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLN dropped -57.95% vs DAX's -45.58%.

On 10-year performance, DAX leads with 9.68% vs 9.42% for FLN. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DAX has performed better with a 9.68% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FLN.

FLN has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 1.50% for DAX.

FLN is categorized as Latin America Equities, while DAX is Europe Equities. FLN tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index, while DAX tracks DAX Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FLN and 0.20% for DAX.

FLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLN and DAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer