FLN vs. DAX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FLN (First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund) and DAX (Global X DAX Germany ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLN is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index, while DAX is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FLN returned 8.57%/yr vs 9.35%/yr for DAX. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DAX.

Performance

FLN vs. DAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLN achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly higher than DAX's 2.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FLN has underperformed DAX with an annualized return of 8.57%, while DAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.35% annualized return.

FLN

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 6.17%
• 6M: 2.90%
• YTD: 17.41%
• 1Y: 43.03%
• 3Y*: 14.16%
• 5Y*: 11.48%
• 10Y*: 8.57%
• ALL TIME*: 2.72%

DAX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 1.29%
• 6M: 1.41%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 1Y: 8.50%
• 3Y*: 17.57%
• 5Y*: 9.16%
• 10Y*: 9.35%
• ALL TIME*: 7.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF	$1.64M	$2.14M	$1.96M
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund	$475.23K	$413.66K	$369.03K

FLN vs. DAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund	17.41%	55.05%	-23.10%	29.68%	2.73%	-6.94%	-12.27%	27.22%	-8.31%	21.54%
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF	2.45%	39.00%	10.55%	23.62%	-18.47%	7.73%	12.27%	22.11%	-22.92%	28.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FLN and DAX is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014	0.45

The correlation between FLN and DAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLN vs. DAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLN	DAX
Financial Services	24.6%	20.5%
Utilities	16.9%	4.5%
Industrials	12.5%	36.0%
Basic Materials	11.9%	4.7%
Energy	8.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.8%	1.1%
Communication Services	6.8%	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	6.4%
Real Estate	5.0%	0.9%
Technology	2.1%	14.3%
Healthcare	0.5%	6.5%

Return for Risk

FLN vs. DAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLN

FLN Risk / Return Rank: 81
FLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FLN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FLN Martin Ratio Rank: 69

DAX

DAX Risk / Return Rank: 20
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLN vs. DAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLN	DAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	0.41	+1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	0.70	+1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.08	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	0.49	+2.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.47	1.51	+6.96

FLN vs. DAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLN Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the DAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLN and DAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLN vs. DAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLN drawdown since its inception was -57.95%, which is greater than DAX's maximum drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLN and DAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLN	DAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.95%	-45.58%	-12.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.10%	-14.82%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.23%	-16.03%	-9.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.95%	-38.92%	+12.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.75%	-45.58%	-12.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.37%	-1.64%	-3.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.79%	-10.43%	-8.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.11%	4.80%	+0.31%

Volatility

FLN vs. DAX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) have volatilities of 4.97% and 4.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLN	DAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.97%	4.82%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.32%	15.31%	+2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.23%	17.87%	+3.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.53%	20.43%	+2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.45%	20.92%	+6.53%

FLN vs. DAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DAX's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLN vs. DAX - Dividend Comparison

FLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than DAX's 2.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF	2.05%	1.47%	2.24%	2.48%	2.80%	2.65%	2.25%	2.47%	3.33%	1.73%	1.78%	1.41%
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund	3.38%	3.40%	6.26%	4.17%	5.57%	4.70%	1.64%	1.91%	3.08%	10.28%	1.06%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLN and DAX in my portfolio?

FLN and DAX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLN or DAX?

FLN has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to DAX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLN dropped -57.95% vs DAX's -45.58%.

Which ETF is better, FLN or DAX?

On 10-year performance, DAX leads with 9.35% vs 8.57% for FLN. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DAX has been the lower-risk option at 4.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLN or DAX?

Over the 10-year period, DAX has performed better with a 9.35% return vs 8.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLN or DAX?

DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLN or DAX?

FLN has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 2.05% for DAX.

What is the main difference between FLN and DAX?

FLN is categorized as Latin America Equities, while DAX is Europe Equities. FLN tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index, while DAX tracks DAX Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FLN and 0.20% for DAX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.