FLMX vs. VXUS
FLMX (Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLMX is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLMX returned 12.58%/yr vs 8.35%/yr for VXUS. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLMX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
FLMX vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLMX achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 12.51% return.
FLMX
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 33.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.20%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
FLMX vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF | 9.45% | 53.62% | -28.45% | 39.35% | 2.40% | 19.58% | -3.50% | 12.13% | -13.32% | -0.96% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 12.51% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 2.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLMX and VXUS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FLMX and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLMX vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLMX
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
FLMX
VXUS
Basic Materials
FLMX
VXUS
Financial Services
FLMX
VXUS
Industrials
FLMX
VXUS
Communication Services
FLMX
VXUS
Real Estate
FLMX
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
FLMX
VXUS
Energy
FLMX
-
VXUS
Healthcare
FLMX
-
VXUS
Technology
FLMX
-
VXUS
Utilities
FLMX
-
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLMX vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
FLMX
VXUS
FLMX vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLMX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 2.62 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 10.07 | -1.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLMX vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLMX drawdown since its inception was -50.05%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMX and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLMX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.05% | -35.97% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.18% | -11.27% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.72% | -13.58% | -18.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.72% | -29.44% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.97% | -3.04% | -3.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.00% | -8.20% | -3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 2.93% | +1.15% |
Volatility
FLMX vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) have volatilities of 6.82% and 7.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLMX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 7.07% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | 14.44% | +3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 16.36% | +5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 16.27% | +5.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 17.03% | +7.64% |
FLMX vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLMX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLMX vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
FLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than VXUS's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF | 1.89% | 3.99% | 3.31% | 2.90% | 4.22% | 3.15% | 1.48% | 2.95% | 2.51% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.59% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLMX and VXUS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to FLMX (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLMX dropped -50.05% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 5-year performance, FLMX leads with 12.58% vs 8.35% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FLMX has been the lower-risk option at 6.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLMX has performed better with a 12.58% return vs 8.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLMX.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.89% for FLMX.
FLMX is categorized as Latin America Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. FLMX tracks FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLMX and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLMX and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer