FLLA vs. XCEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM).
FLLA and XCEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLLA is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2018. XCEM is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Sep 2, 2015. Both FLLA and XCEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLLA or XCEM.
Correlation
The correlation between FLLA and XCEM is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FLLA vs. XCEM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FLLA:
-0.07
XCEM:
0.12
FLLA:
0.06
XCEM:
0.29
FLLA:
1.01
XCEM:
1.04
FLLA:
-0.05
XCEM:
0.11
FLLA:
-0.11
XCEM:
0.32
FLLA:
13.43%
XCEM:
6.71%
FLLA:
21.90%
XCEM:
17.98%
FLLA:
-53.87%
XCEM:
-40.92%
FLLA:
-10.28%
XCEM:
-8.92%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLLA achieves a 23.48% return, which is significantly higher than XCEM's 1.25% return.
FLLA
23.48%
6.79%
8.32%
-3.16%
11.22%
N/A
XCEM
1.25%
1.22%
-4.45%
1.10%
9.43%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLLA vs. XCEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLLA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XCEM's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLLA vs. XCEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FLLA
XCEM
FLLA vs. XCEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLLA vs. XCEM - Dividend Comparison
FLLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than XCEM's 2.73% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | 5.70% | 7.04% | 5.44% | 9.55% | 7.60% | 2.12% | 3.17% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 2.73% | 2.76% | 1.22% | 2.42% | 1.94% | 1.63% | 2.11% | 3.24% | 8.57% | 1.24% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
FLLA vs. XCEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLLA drawdown since its inception was -53.87%, which is greater than XCEM's maximum drawdown of -40.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLA and XCEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLLA vs. XCEM - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) has a higher volatility of 12.05% compared to Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) at 10.78%. This indicates that FLLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.