FLLA vs. XCEM
FLLA (Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF) and XCEM (Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLLA is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index, while XCEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLLA returned 7.11%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for XCEM. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLLA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for XCEM.
Performance
FLLA vs. XCEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLLA achieves a 11.00% return, which is significantly lower than XCEM's 34.20% return.
FLLA
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 32.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- —
XCEM
- 1D
- -6.33%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 34.20%
- 6M
- 36.41%
- 1Y
- 61.17%
- 3Y*
- 24.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
FLLA vs. XCEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | 11.00% | 51.81% | -26.89% | 32.71% | 7.78% | -8.93% | -15.08% | 19.59% | -2.78% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 34.20% | 34.05% | 0.42% | 19.96% | -17.59% | 7.87% | 9.47% | 19.74% | -2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLLA and XCEM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2018 | 0.66 |
The correlation between FLLA and XCEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLLA vs. XCEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLLA
XCEM
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
FLLA
XCEM
Basic Materials
FLLA
XCEM
Energy
FLLA
XCEM
Consumer Defensive
FLLA
XCEM
Industrials
FLLA
XCEM
Utilities
FLLA
XCEM
Communication Services
FLLA
XCEM
Real Estate
FLLA
XCEM
Consumer Cyclical
FLLA
XCEM
Healthcare
FLLA
XCEM
Technology
FLLA
XCEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLLA vs. XCEM — Risk / Return Rank
FLLA
XCEM
FLLA vs. XCEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLLA | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.47 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 4.25 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 16.39 | -9.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLLA vs. XCEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLLA drawdown since its inception was -53.88%, which is greater than XCEM's maximum drawdown of -41.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLA and XCEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLLA | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.88% | -41.24% | -12.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -14.46% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.76% | -18.92% | -8.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | -29.57% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.25% | -6.33% | -5.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.46% | -8.57% | -4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 3.74% | +1.10% |
Volatility
FLLA vs. XCEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) is 5.89%, while Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) has a volatility of 14.01%. This indicates that FLLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLLA | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 14.01% | -8.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 22.56% | -4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.71% | 24.28% | -2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 18.60% | +4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.49% | 19.94% | +7.55% |
FLLA vs. XCEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLLA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XCEM's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLLA vs. XCEM - Dividend Comparison
FLLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than XCEM's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF | 3.49% | 6.06% | 7.04% | 5.45% | 9.55% | 7.60% | 2.12% | 3.18% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 2.42% | 3.25% | 2.76% | 1.22% | 2.42% | 1.94% | 1.63% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 9.56% | 1.24% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLLA and XCEM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XCEM has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to FLLA (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLLA dropped -53.88% vs XCEM's -41.24%.
On 5-year performance, XCEM leads with 11.50% vs 7.11% for FLLA. On fees, XCEM is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, FLLA has been the lower-risk option at 5.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XCEM has performed better with a 11.50% return vs 7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XCEM is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLLA.
FLLA has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.42% for XCEM.
FLLA is categorized as Latin America Equities, while XCEM is Emerging Markets Equities. FLLA tracks FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index, while XCEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLLA and 0.16% for XCEM.
XCEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLLA and XCEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer