PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLKR vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLKR vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLKR vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
27.39%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%2.84%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
-11.03%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%2.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 27.39% return, which is significantly higher than LLY's -11.03% return.


FLKR

1D
2.41%
1M
-14.74%
YTD
27.39%
6M
53.78%
1Y
128.35%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*

LLY

1D
3.78%
1M
-6.23%
YTD
-11.03%
6M
16.00%
1Y
19.42%
3Y*
41.64%
5Y*
40.20%
10Y*
31.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLKR vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKR vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLKRLLYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.66

0.46

+3.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.85

0.90

+2.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.13

+0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.74

0.54

+5.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.99

1.33

+21.66

FLKR vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 3.66, which is higher than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and LLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLKRLLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66

0.46

+3.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

1.26

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.57

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and LLY is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLKR vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than LLY's 0.65% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
3.04%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%0.00%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.65%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum LLY drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and LLY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLKRLLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-68.24%

+18.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.03%

-30.26%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.51%

-34.48%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.79%

-13.86%

-2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-19.25%

-3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

12.39%

-6.64%

Volatility

FLKR vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 19.74% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 9.94%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLKRLLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.74%

9.94%

+9.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.25%

26.02%

+4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.28%

42.60%

-7.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.00%

32.17%

-6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.40%

29.82%

-3.42%