PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLJH vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FLJHVOO
YTD Return23.07%26.94%
1Y Return23.21%35.06%
3Y Return (Ann)16.79%10.23%
5Y Return (Ann)16.30%15.77%
Sharpe Ratio1.263.08
Sortino Ratio1.664.09
Omega Ratio1.241.58
Calmar Ratio1.204.46
Martin Ratio4.3320.36
Ulcer Index5.63%1.85%
Daily Std Dev19.32%12.23%
Max Drawdown-31.36%-33.99%
Current Drawdown-5.52%-0.25%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between FLJH and VOO is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FLJH vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FLJH achieves a 23.07% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 26.94% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.25%
13.73%
FLJH
VOO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLJH vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
Expense ratio chart for FLJH: current value at 0.09% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.09%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLJH vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLJH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLJH, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLJH, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLJH, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLJH, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.20
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLJH, currently valued at 4.33, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.33
VOO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VOO, currently valued at 3.08, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VOO, currently valued at 4.09, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VOO, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.58
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VOO, currently valued at 4.46, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VOO, currently valued at 20.36, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0020.36

FLJH vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJH and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.26
3.08
FLJH
VOO

Dividends

FLJH vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.69%, more than VOO's 1.23% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
22.69%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.23%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%1.84%

Drawdowns

FLJH vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.52%
-0.25%
FLJH
VOO

Volatility

FLJH vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.78%. This indicates that FLJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.35%
3.78%
FLJH
VOO