FLJH vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FLJH and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLJH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both FLJH and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLJH or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between FLJH and VOO is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FLJH vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FLJH:
1.33
VOO:
2.04
FLJH:
1.74
VOO:
2.72
FLJH:
1.25
VOO:
1.38
FLJH:
1.27
VOO:
3.02
FLJH:
4.44
VOO:
13.60
FLJH:
5.85%
VOO:
1.88%
FLJH:
19.56%
VOO:
12.52%
FLJH:
-31.36%
VOO:
-33.99%
FLJH:
-4.47%
VOO:
-3.52%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLJH having a 24.45% return and VOO slightly higher at 24.65%.
FLJH
24.45%
1.63%
3.91%
26.59%
15.72%
N/A
VOO
24.65%
-0.29%
7.63%
24.77%
14.57%
13.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLJH vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLJH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLJH vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLJH vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than VOO's 1.26% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 2.37% | 25.59% | 26.67% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 0.92% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
FLJH vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLJH vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.56%. This indicates that FLJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.