PortfoliosLab logo
FLIC vs. OCSL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FLIC and OCSL is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FLIC vs. OCSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The First of Long Island Corporation (FLIC) and Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLIC:

0.83

OCSL:

-0.71

Sortino Ratio

FLIC:

1.35

OCSL:

-0.82

Omega Ratio

FLIC:

1.16

OCSL:

0.88

Calmar Ratio

FLIC:

0.48

OCSL:

-0.53

Martin Ratio

FLIC:

2.35

OCSL:

-1.21

Ulcer Index

FLIC:

12.29%

OCSL:

13.13%

Daily Std Dev

FLIC:

36.24%

OCSL:

22.77%

Max Drawdown

FLIC:

-63.09%

OCSL:

-59.52%

Current Drawdown

FLIC:

-46.95%

OCSL:

-21.81%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLIC:

$269.21M

OCSL:

$1.27B

EPS

FLIC:

$0.72

OCSL:

$0.12

PE Ratio

FLIC:

16.49

OCSL:

120.08

PEG Ratio

FLIC:

2.89

OCSL:

0.93

PS Ratio

FLIC:

3.15

OCSL:

3.59

PB Ratio

FLIC:

0.70

OCSL:

0.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLIC:

$177.94M

OCSL:

$100.21M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLIC:

$85.34M

OCSL:

$9.09M

EBITDA (TTM)

FLIC:

$22.94M

OCSL:

$67.31M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLIC achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly higher than OCSL's -2.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FLIC has underperformed OCSL with an annualized return of 0.48%, while OCSL has yielded a comparatively higher 6.44% annualized return.


FLIC

YTD

3.43%

1M

-2.14%

6M

-14.24%

1Y

27.58%

3Y*

-8.90%

5Y*

0.40%

10Y*

0.48%

OCSL

YTD

-2.79%

1M

6.03%

6M

-6.61%

1Y

-16.12%

3Y*

-0.21%

5Y*

12.66%

10Y*

6.44%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLIC vs. OCSL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLIC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLIC is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLIC is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLIC is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLIC is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLIC is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLIC is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

OCSL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of OCSL is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of OCSL is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of OCSL is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of OCSL is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of OCSL is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of OCSL is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLIC vs. OCSL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The First of Long Island Corporation (FLIC) and Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLIC Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the OCSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIC and OCSL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FLIC vs. OCSL - Dividend Comparison

FLIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%, less than OCSL's 14.71% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLIC
The First of Long Island Corporation
7.08%7.19%6.34%5.67%3.57%4.09%2.75%2.36%2.04%1.91%3.23%1.88%
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation
14.71%14.40%11.12%11.86%7.37%7.27%6.96%8.75%8.38%13.41%10.85%12.88%

Drawdowns

FLIC vs. OCSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLIC drawdown since its inception was -63.09%, which is greater than OCSL's maximum drawdown of -59.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIC and OCSL.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FLIC vs. OCSL - Volatility Comparison

The First of Long Island Corporation (FLIC) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation (OCSL) at 5.84%. This indicates that FLIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OCSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FLIC vs. OCSL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The First of Long Island Corporation and Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M20212022202320242025
42.83M
-40.19M
(FLIC) Total Revenue
(OCSL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FLIC vs. OCSL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The First of Long Island Corporation and Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
49.9%
100.0%
(FLIC) Gross Margin
(OCSL) Gross Margin
FLIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, The First of Long Island Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.37M and revenue of 42.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.

OCSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation reported a gross profit of -40.19M and revenue of -40.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

FLIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, The First of Long Island Corporation reported an operating income of 4.24M and revenue of 42.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

OCSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation reported an operating income of -35.99M and revenue of -40.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 89.5%.

FLIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, The First of Long Island Corporation reported a net income of 3.76M and revenue of 42.83M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.

OCSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation reported a net income of -36.25M and revenue of -40.19M, resulting in a net margin of 90.2%.