PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLGV vs. VCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLGV vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGV achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than VCSH's 0.72% return.


FLGV

1D
0.10%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.30%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
-0.17%
10Y*

VCSH

1D
0.10%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
2.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGV vs. VCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLGV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
0.21%6.22%0.62%4.18%-11.53%-2.39%-0.27%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.72%6.77%4.91%6.20%-5.62%-0.63%2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGV and VCSH is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020

0.79

The correlation between FLGV and VCSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLGV vs. VCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGV
FLGV Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FLGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGV vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLGVVCSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.42

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

2.93

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

11.86

-8.68

FLGV vs. VCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGV Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGV and VCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLGV vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGV drawdown since its inception was -17.63%, which is greater than VCSH's maximum drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGV and VCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGVVCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.63%

-12.86%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-1.40%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.23%

-1.40%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.26%

-9.48%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.40%

-0.24%

-5.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-0.96%

-7.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

0.35%

+0.67%

Volatility

FLGV vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) at 0.69%. This indicates that FLGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGVVCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

0.69%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

1.48%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

1.92%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.44%

2.89%

+2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.14%

3.35%

+1.79%

FLGV vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLGV vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

FLGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than VCSH's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLGV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
4.14%4.07%4.13%3.46%2.21%1.92%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.45%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLGV and VCSH have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGV has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to VCSH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGV dropped -17.63% vs VCSH's -12.86%.

On 5-year performance, VCSH leads with 2.37% vs -0.17% for FLGV. On fees, VCSH is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VCSH has performed better with a 2.37% return vs -0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCSH is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for FLGV.

VCSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 4.14% for FLGV.

FLGV is categorized as Government Bonds, while VCSH is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGV and 0.04% for VCSH.

VCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLGV and VCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer