FLGT vs. SMG
FLGT (Fulgent Genetics, Inc.) and SMG (The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company) are both stocks. FLGT operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while SMG operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, FLGT returned -29.08%/yr vs -14.82%/yr for SMG. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FLGT vs. SMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLGT achieves a -37.00% return, which is significantly lower than SMG's 14.91% return.
FLGT
- 1D
- -18.11%
- 1M
- -20.62%
- 6M
- -36.83%
- YTD
- -37.00%
- 1Y
- -10.69%
- 3Y*
- -24.74%
- 5Y*
- -29.08%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.14%
SMG
- 1D
- -3.85%
- 1M
- -4.60%
- 6M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 14.91%
- 1Y
- 10.94%
- 3Y*
- 1.54%
- 5Y*
- -14.82%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.50M | $5.58M | $7.39M | |
| $71.67M | $69.95M | $61.63M |
FLGT vs. SMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGT Fulgent Genetics, Inc. | -37.00% | 42.23% | -36.11% | -2.92% | -70.39% | 93.07% | 303.88% | 306.94% | -27.63% | -62.14% |
SMG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 14.91% | -8.01% | 8.28% | 36.92% | -68.81% | -18.03% | 96.18% | 77.05% | -41.00% | 14.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLGT and SMG is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.21 |
The correlation between FLGT and SMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FLGT:
$470.03M
SMG:
$3.82B
FLGT:
-$2.80
SMG:
$1.12
FLGT:
1.54
SMG:
1.14
FLGT:
$323.93M
SMG:
$3.37B
FLGT:
$115.26M
SMG:
$1.09B
FLGT:
-$72.79M
SMG:
$434.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLGT vs. SMG — Risk / Return Rank
FLGT
SMG
FLGT vs. SMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (FLGT) and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLGT | SMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.08 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 0.48 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 1.00 | -1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLGT vs. SMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLGT drawdown since its inception was -92.50%, which is greater than SMG's maximum drawdown of -83.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGT and SMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLGT | SMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.50% | -83.55% | -8.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.30% | -20.12% | -35.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.54% | -47.42% | -17.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.56% | -76.67% | -10.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.00% | -68.50% | -22.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.99% | -22.18% | -39.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.18% | 9.53% | +20.65% |
Volatility
FLGT vs. SMG - Volatility Comparison
Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (FLGT) has a higher volatility of 21.41% compared to The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) at 14.53%. This indicates that FLGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLGT | SMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.41% | 14.53% | +6.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.11% | 30.08% | +30.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.38% | 36.38% | +24.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.92% | 46.85% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.46% | 40.72% | +34.74% |
Dividends
FLGT vs. SMG - Dividend Comparison
FLGT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGT Fulgent Genetics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | 4.02% | 4.52% | 3.98% | 4.14% | 5.43% | 1.59% | 3.72% | 2.13% | 3.51% | 1.93% | 2.03% | 2.85% |
Financials
FLGT vs. SMG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fulgent Genetics, Inc. and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FLGT vs. SMG - Profitability Comparison
FLGT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fulgent Genetics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.68M and revenue of 85.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.1%.
SMG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported a gross profit of 365.90M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.2%.
FLGT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fulgent Genetics, Inc. reported an operating income of -29.72M and revenue of 85.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -34.8%.
SMG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported an operating income of 169.60M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.5%.
FLGT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fulgent Genetics, Inc. reported a net income of -29.53M and revenue of 85.39M, resulting in a net margin of -34.6%.
SMG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company reported a net income of 103.60M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLGT and SMG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLGT has higher volatility (21.41%) compared to SMG (14.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGT dropped -92.50% vs SMG's -83.55%.
SMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLGT and SMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer