PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLGC vs. ACB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FLGC and ACB is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

FLGC vs. ACB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC) and Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-18.97%
-33.05%
FLGC
ACB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLGC:

-0.38

ACB:

-0.06

Sortino Ratio

FLGC:

0.11

ACB:

0.77

Omega Ratio

FLGC:

1.01

ACB:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

FLGC:

-0.47

ACB:

-0.06

Martin Ratio

FLGC:

-0.95

ACB:

-0.17

Ulcer Index

FLGC:

49.22%

ACB:

36.32%

Daily Std Dev

FLGC:

122.15%

ACB:

102.48%

Max Drawdown

FLGC:

-99.81%

ACB:

-99.80%

Current Drawdown

FLGC:

-99.74%

ACB:

-99.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLGC:

$15.57M

ACB:

$259.17M

EPS

FLGC:

-$1.35

ACB:

-$0.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLGC:

$46.18M

ACB:

$231.97M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLGC:

$7.47M

ACB:

$137.88M

EBITDA (TTM)

FLGC:

-$9.71M

ACB:

$16.31M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGC achieves a -12.50% return, which is significantly lower than ACB's -9.18% return.


FLGC

YTD

-12.50%

1M

-14.98%

6M

-18.81%

1Y

-36.98%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ACB

YTD

-9.18%

1M

-10.02%

6M

-32.99%

1Y

-6.31%

5Y*

-56.32%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLGC vs. ACB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLGC is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLGC is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLGC is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLGC is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLGC is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLGC is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ACB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACB is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACB is 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACB is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACB is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACB is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACB is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLGC vs. ACB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC) and Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLGC, currently valued at -0.38, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.38-0.06
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLGC, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.110.77
The chart of Omega ratio for FLGC, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.011.09
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLGC, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.47-0.06
The chart of Martin ratio for FLGC, currently valued at -0.95, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.95-0.17
FLGC
ACB

The current FLGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the ACB Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGC and ACB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.38
-0.06
FLGC
ACB

Dividends

FLGC vs. ACB - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLGC nor ACB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FLGC vs. ACB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGC drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, roughly equal to the maximum ACB drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGC and ACB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-99.00%-98.00%-97.00%-96.00%-95.00%-94.00%-93.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-99.74%
-96.23%
FLGC
ACB

Volatility

FLGC vs. ACB - Volatility Comparison

Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC) has a higher volatility of 17.64% compared to Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) at 13.77%. This indicates that FLGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
17.64%
13.77%
FLGC
ACB

Financials

FLGC vs. ACB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flora Growth Corp. and Aurora Cannabis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab