PortfoliosLab logo
FLGC vs. ACB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FLGC and ACB is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FLGC vs. ACB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC) and Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLGC:

-0.45

ACB:

-0.18

Sortino Ratio

FLGC:

-0.25

ACB:

0.23

Omega Ratio

FLGC:

0.97

ACB:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

FLGC:

-0.50

ACB:

-0.16

Martin Ratio

FLGC:

-1.11

ACB:

-0.57

Ulcer Index

FLGC:

45.20%

ACB:

28.26%

Daily Std Dev

FLGC:

102.68%

ACB:

77.00%

Max Drawdown

FLGC:

-99.87%

ACB:

-99.80%

Current Drawdown

FLGC:

-99.81%

ACB:

-99.63%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLGC:

$15.12M

ACB:

$302.16M

EPS

FLGC:

-$0.96

ACB:

$0.19

PS Ratio

FLGC:

0.28

ACB:

0.94

PB Ratio

FLGC:

3.18

ACB:

0.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLGC:

$53.26M

ACB:

$252.76M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLGC:

$11.53M

ACB:

$165.71M

EBITDA (TTM)

FLGC:

-$12.83M

ACB:

$62.78M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGC achieves a -34.95% return, which is significantly lower than ACB's 24.71% return.


FLGC

YTD

-34.95%

1M

11.67%

6M

-61.49%

1Y

-41.74%

3Y*

-67.76%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ACB

YTD

24.71%

1M

11.58%

6M

16.48%

1Y

-14.38%

3Y*

-31.65%

5Y*

-48.10%

10Y*

-17.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Flora Growth Corp.

Aurora Cannabis Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLGC vs. ACB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLGC is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLGC is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLGC is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLGC is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLGC is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLGC is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ACB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACB is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACB is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACB is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACB is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACB is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACB is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLGC vs. ACB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC) and Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the ACB Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGC and ACB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FLGC vs. ACB - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLGC nor ACB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FLGC vs. ACB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGC drawdown since its inception was -99.87%, roughly equal to the maximum ACB drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGC and ACB.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FLGC vs. ACB - Volatility Comparison

Flora Growth Corp. (FLGC) has a higher volatility of 26.50% compared to Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) at 13.01%. This indicates that FLGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FLGC vs. ACB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flora Growth Corp. and Aurora Cannabis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M20212022202320242025
11.79M
88.20M
(FLGC) Total Revenue
(ACB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FLGC vs. ACB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Flora Growth Corp. and Aurora Cannabis Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
24.5%
89.6%
(FLGC) Gross Margin
(ACB) Gross Margin
FLGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Flora Growth Corp. reported a gross profit of 2.89M and revenue of 11.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

ACB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.00M and revenue of 88.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.6%.

FLGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Flora Growth Corp. reported an operating income of 1.72M and revenue of 11.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.

ACB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported an operating income of 36.86M and revenue of 88.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.8%.

FLGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Flora Growth Corp. reported a net income of -758.00K and revenue of 11.79M, resulting in a net margin of -6.4%.

ACB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Aurora Cannabis Inc. reported a net income of 31.67M and revenue of 88.20M, resulting in a net margin of 35.9%.