FLGB vs. LVHI
FLGB (Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF) and LVHI (Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLGB is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the QS International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLGB returned 10.55%/yr vs 15.80%/yr for LVHI. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLGB charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
FLGB vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLGB achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 11.71% return.
FLGB
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- 1Y
- 19.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 29.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.91%
- 5Y*
- 15.80%
- 10Y*
- —
FLGB vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF | 4.95% | 33.73% | 8.77% | 14.33% | -6.00% | 17.14% | -9.47% | 23.23% | -11.60% | 1.12% |
LVHI Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 11.71% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | -0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLGB and LVHI is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FLGB and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLGB vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLGB
LVHI
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
FLGB
LVHI
Industrials
FLGB
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
FLGB
LVHI
Healthcare
FLGB
LVHI
Energy
FLGB
LVHI
Basic Materials
FLGB
LVHI
Utilities
FLGB
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
FLGB
LVHI
Communication Services
FLGB
LVHI
Real Estate
FLGB
LVHI
Technology
FLGB
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLGB vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
FLGB
LVHI
FLGB vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLGB | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 3.19 | -1.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 4.37 | -2.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.60 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 4.95 | -3.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 20.63 | -13.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLGB | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 3.19 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 1.44 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.82 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
FLGB vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLGB drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGB and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLGB | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.61% | -32.31% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.26% | -6.08% | -4.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.13% | -11.99% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -11.99% | -13.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.86% | -1.56% | -3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -3.52% | -3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 1.46% | +1.33% |
Volatility
FLGB vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) at 3.05%. This indicates that FLGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLGB | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 3.05% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.06% | 7.50% | +4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.18% | 9.45% | +4.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 11.06% | +5.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 13.76% | +5.21% |
FLGB vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLGB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLGB vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
FLGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than LVHI's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGB Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF | 3.33% | 3.50% | 4.42% | 3.95% | 4.23% | 2.93% | 2.67% | 4.30% | 3.92% | 0.43% | 0.00% |
LVHI Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 4.50% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLGB and LVHI have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLGB has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to LVHI (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGB dropped -42.61% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.80% vs 10.55% for FLGB. On fees, FLGB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.80% return vs 10.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLGB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.33% for FLGB.
FLGB is categorized as Europe Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. FLGB tracks FTSE UK RIC Capped Index, while LVHI tracks QS International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGB and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLGB and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer