PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLGB vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLGB vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLGB achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 11.71% return.


FLGB

1D
-1.23%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
4.95%
6M
8.36%
1Y
19.53%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*

LVHI

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.49%
YTD
11.71%
6M
13.79%
1Y
29.95%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
15.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLGB vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
4.95%33.73%8.77%14.33%-6.00%17.14%-9.47%23.23%-11.60%1.12%
LVHI
Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
11.71%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%-0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FLGB and LVHI is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.70

The correlation between FLGB and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLGB vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLGB
LVHI

Financial Services

24.2%
23.6%

Industrials

14.2%
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

14.0%
8.7%

Healthcare

13.6%
7.4%

Energy

11.8%
17.4%

Basic Materials

8.6%
6.1%

Utilities

5.3%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
5.3%

Communication Services

2.6%
5.8%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.9%

Technology

0.7%
0.1%

Financial Services

FLGB
24.2%
LVHI
23.6%

Industrials

FLGB
14.2%
LVHI
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

FLGB
14.0%
LVHI
8.7%

Healthcare

FLGB
13.6%
LVHI
7.4%

Energy

FLGB
11.8%
LVHI
17.4%

Basic Materials

FLGB
8.6%
LVHI
6.1%

Utilities

FLGB
5.3%
LVHI
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FLGB
4.4%
LVHI
5.3%

Communication Services

FLGB
2.6%
LVHI
5.8%

Real Estate

FLGB
0.7%
LVHI
1.9%

Technology

FLGB
0.7%
LVHI
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLGB vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLGB
FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLGB vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) and Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLGBLVHIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

3.19

-1.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

4.37

-2.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.60

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

4.95

-3.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.03

20.63

-13.60

FLGB vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLGB Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLGB and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLGBLVHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

3.19

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

1.44

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.82

-0.40

Drawdowns

FLGB vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLGB drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLGB and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLGBLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.61%

-32.31%

-10.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.26%

-6.08%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.13%

-11.99%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.90%

-11.99%

-13.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.86%

-1.56%

-3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-3.52%

-3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.46%

+1.33%

Volatility

FLGB vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) at 3.05%. This indicates that FLGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLGBLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

3.05%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

7.50%

+4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.18%

9.45%

+4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

11.06%

+5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

13.76%

+5.21%

FLGB vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLGB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLGB vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

FLGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than LVHI's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
3.33%3.50%4.42%3.95%4.23%2.93%2.67%4.30%3.92%0.43%0.00%
LVHI
Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
4.50%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLGB and LVHI have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGB has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to LVHI (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLGB dropped -42.61% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.80% vs 10.55% for FLGB. On fees, FLGB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.80% return vs 10.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.33% for FLGB.

FLGB is categorized as Europe Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. FLGB tracks FTSE UK RIC Capped Index, while LVHI tracks QS International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLGB and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLGB and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer