PortfoliosLab logo
FLEX vs. LNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FLEX and LNG is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FLEX vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flex Ltd. (FLEX) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLEX:

0.93

LNG:

1.63

Sortino Ratio

FLEX:

1.44

LNG:

2.21

Omega Ratio

FLEX:

1.20

LNG:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

FLEX:

1.06

LNG:

2.30

Martin Ratio

FLEX:

3.33

LNG:

7.18

Ulcer Index

FLEX:

12.71%

LNG:

7.08%

Daily Std Dev

FLEX:

46.34%

LNG:

29.14%

Max Drawdown

FLEX:

-96.37%

LNG:

-97.84%

Current Drawdown

FLEX:

-6.10%

LNG:

-7.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLEX:

$16.10B

LNG:

$52.13B

EPS

FLEX:

$2.11

LNG:

$13.63

PE Ratio

FLEX:

19.91

LNG:

17.25

PEG Ratio

FLEX:

0.97

LNG:

2.14

PS Ratio

FLEX:

0.62

LNG:

3.11

PB Ratio

FLEX:

3.22

LNG:

9.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLEX:

$24.16B

LNG:

$16.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLEX:

$2.04B

LNG:

$8.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

FLEX:

$1.59B

LNG:

$6.53B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLEX having a 8.75% return and LNG slightly higher at 9.01%. Over the past 10 years, FLEX has outperformed LNG with an annualized return of 22.30%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.41% annualized return.


FLEX

YTD

8.75%

1M

32.37%

6M

12.62%

1Y

42.49%

3Y*

79.77%

5Y*

55.15%

10Y*

22.30%

LNG

YTD

9.01%

1M

0.97%

6M

9.07%

1Y

46.97%

3Y*

22.59%

5Y*

39.55%

10Y*

12.41%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Flex Ltd.

Cheniere Energy, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLEX vs. LNG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLEX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLEX is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLEX is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLEX is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLEX is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLEX is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLEX is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

LNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNG is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNG is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNG is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNG is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNG is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNG is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLEX vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flex Ltd. (FLEX) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLEX and LNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FLEX vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

FLEX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.


TTM2024202320222021
FLEX
Flex Ltd.
0.00%21.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.83%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%

Drawdowns

FLEX vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLEX drawdown since its inception was -96.37%, roughly equal to the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLEX and LNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FLEX vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

Flex Ltd. (FLEX) has a higher volatility of 11.04% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 7.40%. This indicates that FLEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FLEX vs. LNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flex Ltd. and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
6.40B
5.44B
(FLEX) Total Revenue
(LNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FLEX vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Flex Ltd. and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
8.8%
20.0%
(FLEX) Gross Margin
(LNG) Gross Margin
FLEX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flex Ltd. reported a gross profit of 563.00M and revenue of 6.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.8%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.09B and revenue of 5.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

FLEX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flex Ltd. reported an operating income of 305.00M and revenue of 6.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 961.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

FLEX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Flex Ltd. reported a net income of 222.00M and revenue of 6.40B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 353.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.