PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLDR vs. FCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLDR vs. FCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLDR achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly higher than FCOR's 0.48% return.


FLDR

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.76%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*

FCOR

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.32%
1Y
6.06%
3Y*
5.65%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*
2.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLDR vs. FCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
1.44%5.41%5.71%6.32%-0.33%-0.18%2.01%4.52%0.94%
FCOR
Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF
0.48%7.88%3.01%8.95%-15.88%-1.64%11.39%14.87%0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FLDR and FCOR is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2018

0.49

The correlation between FLDR and FCOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.69 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLDR vs. FCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FCOR
FCOR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLDR vs. FCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLDRFCORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+8.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.75

1.24

+1.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.24

1.99

+8.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

70.25

6.21

+64.03

FLDR vs. FCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLDR Sharpe Ratio is 5.95, which is higher than the FCOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLDR and FCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLDRFCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.95

1.39

+4.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.07

0.10

+2.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.43

+0.19

Drawdowns

FLDR vs. FCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, smaller than the maximum FCOR drawdown of -22.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDR and FCOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLDRFCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-22.60%

+10.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.47%

-3.06%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.76%

-6.60%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.33%

-22.60%

+20.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-1.18%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-4.73%

+4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.98%

-0.91%

Volatility

FLDR vs. FCOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) is 0.19%, while Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF (FCOR) has a volatility of 1.61%. This indicates that FLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLDRFCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

1.61%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.58%

3.32%

-2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80%

4.38%

-3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.21%

7.06%

-5.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.26%

7.10%

-1.84%

FLDR vs. FCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLDR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FCOR's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLDR vs. FCOR - Dividend Comparison

FLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than FCOR's 4.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCOR
Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF
4.55%4.47%4.35%3.70%3.30%2.34%2.99%3.10%3.65%2.81%3.04%3.82%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.43%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLDR and FCOR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCOR has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to FLDR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLDR dropped -12.23% vs FCOR's -22.60%.

On 5-year performance, FLDR leads with 3.70% vs 0.70% for FCOR. On fees, FLDR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLDR has performed better with a 3.70% return vs 0.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLDR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FCOR.

FCOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.55%, compared with 4.43% for FLDR.

Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLDR and 0.36% for FCOR.

FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.95 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLDR and FCOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer