FLCSX vs. IWD
FLCSX (Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund) and IWD (iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF) are both funds - FLCSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity Investments, while IWD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index. FLCSX is actively managed, while IWD is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FLCSX returned 15.83%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for IWD. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLCSX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IWD.
Performance
FLCSX vs. IWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCSX achieves a 9.23% return, which is significantly lower than IWD's 15.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FLCSX has outperformed IWD with an annualized return of 15.83%, while IWD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.61% annualized return.
FLCSX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- 25.24%
- 5Y*
- 16.17%
- 10Y*
- 15.83%
IWD
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 15.35%
- 6M
- 14.66%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
FLCSX vs. IWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCSX Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund | 9.23% | 27.49% | 26.31% | 23.51% | -8.02% | 25.80% | 9.05% | 31.59% | -13.62% | 17.86% |
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 15.35% | 15.68% | 14.17% | 11.34% | -7.75% | 24.95% | 2.73% | 26.12% | -8.45% | 13.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCSX and IWD is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000 | 0.92 |
The correlation between FLCSX and IWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCSX vs. IWD — Risk / Return Rank
FLCSX
IWD
FLCSX vs. IWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLCSX | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.45 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 4.18 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.96 | 17.32 | -3.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLCSX vs. IWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCSX drawdown since its inception was -63.67%, which is greater than IWD's maximum drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCSX and IWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCSX | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.67% | -60.10% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -6.79% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.82% | -15.71% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.69% | -19.04% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.11% | -38.51% | +1.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -1.16% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.80% | -8.64% | -5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 1.63% | +0.48% |
Volatility
FLCSX vs. IWD - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) at 4.14%. This indicates that FLCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCSX | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 4.14% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 8.67% | +1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 11.27% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 14.84% | +2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 17.28% | +1.40% |
FLCSX vs. IWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IWD's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLCSX vs. IWD - Dividend Comparison
FLCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.04%, more than IWD's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCSX Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund | 9.04% | 6.50% | 4.26% | 2.83% | 3.07% | 4.71% | 3.93% | 5.43% | 7.63% | 3.25% | 3.61% | 4.55% |
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.45% | 1.69% | 1.87% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 1.62% | 2.05% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.09% | 2.25% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCSX and IWD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCSX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to IWD (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCSX dropped -63.67% vs IWD's -60.10%.
IWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCSX and IWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer