PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCSX vs. FBALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCSX vs. FBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCSX achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than FBALX's 10.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FLCSX has outperformed FBALX with an annualized return of 15.32%, while FBALX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.77% annualized return.


FLCSX

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.26%
YTD
9.75%
6M
11.60%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
25.44%
5Y*
15.93%
10Y*
15.32%

FBALX

1D
0.23%
1M
4.04%
YTD
10.30%
6M
10.50%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
11.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCSX vs. FBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCSX
Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund
9.75%27.49%26.31%23.51%-8.02%25.80%9.05%31.59%-13.62%17.86%
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
10.30%15.11%16.09%20.31%-18.29%18.27%22.45%24.40%-3.98%16.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCSX and FBALX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 1995

0.92

The correlation between FLCSX and FBALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCSX vs. FBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCSX
FLCSX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FLCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FBALX
FBALX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCSX vs. FBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCSXFBALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.57

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.94

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.16

18.87

-3.70

FLCSX vs. FBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the FBALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCSX and FBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCSXFBALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.97

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.79

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.92

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.81

-0.31

Drawdowns

FLCSX vs. FBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCSX drawdown since its inception was -63.67%, which is greater than FBALX's maximum drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCSX and FBALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCSXFBALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.67%

-43.57%

-20.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-6.47%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.82%

-12.88%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.69%

-22.89%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.11%

-26.68%

-10.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

0.00%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.82%

-4.37%

-9.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.35%

+0.73%

Volatility

FLCSX vs. FBALX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) at 2.58%. This indicates that FLCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCSXFBALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

2.58%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

6.80%

+2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

8.58%

+3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

12.18%

+4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

12.78%

+5.88%

FLCSX vs. FBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCSX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FBALX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCSX vs. FBALX - Dividend Comparison

FLCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than FBALX's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
5.14%5.69%5.67%2.28%8.06%9.66%5.90%4.24%10.99%7.90%3.07%7.70%
FLCSX
Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund
5.92%6.50%4.26%2.83%3.07%4.71%3.93%5.43%7.63%3.25%3.61%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FLCSX and FBALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLCSX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to FBALX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCSX dropped -63.67% vs FBALX's -43.57%.

FBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCSX and FBALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer