PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCPX vs. PRBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCPX vs. PRBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) and Parnassus Core Equity Fund (PRBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCPX achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly higher than PRBLX's 6.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FLCPX has outperformed PRBLX with an annualized return of 15.65%, while PRBLX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.61% annualized return.


FLCPX

1D
0.26%
1M
5.23%
YTD
11.57%
6M
11.93%
1Y
29.57%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.18%
10Y*
15.65%

PRBLX

1D
0.42%
1M
3.31%
YTD
6.62%
6M
6.14%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
16.52%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCPX vs. PRBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
11.57%17.84%25.08%26.25%-18.06%28.61%18.24%31.59%-4.38%21.74%
PRBLX
Parnassus Core Equity Fund
6.62%11.67%18.58%24.97%-18.64%27.59%21.21%30.68%-0.30%16.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCPX and PRBLX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2016

0.95

The correlation between FLCPX and PRBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCPX vs. PRBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCPX
FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PRBLX
PRBLX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PRBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PRBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCPX vs. PRBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) and Parnassus Core Equity Fund (PRBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLCPXPRBLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.56

1.36

+1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

1.95

+1.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.24

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

1.42

+2.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.14

5.54

+10.59

FLCPX vs. PRBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the PRBLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCPX and PRBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLCPXPRBLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

1.36

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.63

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.79

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.71

+0.21

Drawdowns

FLCPX vs. PRBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCPX drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, smaller than the maximum PRBLX drawdown of -42.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCPX and PRBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCPXPRBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-42.20%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-11.63%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-16.31%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.40%

-26.31%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-30.09%

-3.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-4.05%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.97%

-1.07%

Volatility

FLCPX vs. PRBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) is 2.82%, while Parnassus Core Equity Fund (PRBLX) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that FLCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCPXPRBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

3.07%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

9.12%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

11.80%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

16.25%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

17.27%

+0.89%

FLCPX vs. PRBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCPX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than PRBLX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCPX vs. PRBLX - Dividend Comparison

FLCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than PRBLX's 17.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
0.50%0.56%6.11%7.05%11.23%10.38%3.93%1.74%2.18%1.57%0.76%0.00%
PRBLX
Parnassus Core Equity Fund
17.85%19.08%10.00%6.01%10.13%7.77%5.87%8.02%9.64%7.16%3.80%9.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FLCPX and PRBLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRBLX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to FLCPX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCPX dropped -33.87% vs PRBLX's -42.20%.

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCPX and PRBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer