PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLCOX vs. TILCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLCOX vs. TILCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCOX achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly lower than TILCX's 16.59% return.


FLCOX

1D
0.04%
1M
1.49%
YTD
15.46%
6M
14.24%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*

TILCX

1D
0.34%
1M
0.72%
YTD
16.59%
6M
15.90%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLCOX vs. TILCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
15.46%15.90%14.38%11.48%-7.57%25.09%2.87%26.54%-8.38%10.90%
TILCX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund
16.59%11.82%11.32%9.64%-5.10%25.89%3.08%26.67%-9.38%16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCOX and TILCX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.97

The correlation between FLCOX and TILCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLCOX vs. TILCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCOX
FLCOX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TILCX
TILCX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
TILCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TILCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLCOX vs. TILCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLCOXTILCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

3.89

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.84

14.74

+2.10

FLCOX vs. TILCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the TILCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCOX and TILCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLCOX vs. TILCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCOX drawdown since its inception was -38.28%, smaller than the maximum TILCX drawdown of -57.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCOX and TILCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLCOXTILCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.28%

-57.60%

+19.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.80%

-7.00%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.60%

-15.55%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.00%

-17.95%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-1.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-7.63%

+3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.84%

-0.21%

Volatility

FLCOX vs. TILCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX) at 3.93%. This indicates that FLCOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLCOXTILCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

3.93%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.73%

8.77%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

11.21%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

14.88%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

17.55%

+0.07%

FLCOX vs. TILCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCOX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TILCX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLCOX vs. TILCX - Dividend Comparison

FLCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than TILCX's 10.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
1.31%1.51%1.92%1.99%2.01%1.55%2.28%3.82%2.79%0.60%0.00%0.00%
TILCX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund
10.97%12.80%8.32%8.41%19.17%6.88%3.05%5.67%7.61%4.79%4.10%6.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FLCOX and TILCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLCOX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to TILCX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCOX dropped -38.28% vs TILCX's -57.60%.

FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLCOX and TILCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer