PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLCOX vs. RPT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLCOX and RPT is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

FLCOX vs. RPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) and RPT Realty (RPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.95%
-18.82%
FLCOX
RPT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLCOX:

1.69

RPT:

-0.92

Sortino Ratio

FLCOX:

2.39

RPT:

-1.26

Omega Ratio

FLCOX:

1.30

RPT:

0.85

Calmar Ratio

FLCOX:

2.40

RPT:

-0.55

Martin Ratio

FLCOX:

7.28

RPT:

-1.08

Ulcer Index

FLCOX:

2.58%

RPT:

37.97%

Daily Std Dev

FLCOX:

11.11%

RPT:

44.66%

Max Drawdown

FLCOX:

-38.28%

RPT:

-74.30%

Current Drawdown

FLCOX:

-4.54%

RPT:

-72.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCOX achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than RPT's -3.03% return.


FLCOX

YTD

2.76%

1M

0.43%

6M

5.95%

1Y

19.62%

5Y*

8.93%

10Y*

N/A

RPT

YTD

-3.03%

1M

0.70%

6M

-18.84%

1Y

-40.65%

5Y*

-21.09%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLCOX vs. RPT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCOX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLCOX is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLCOX is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLCOX is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLCOX is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLCOX is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLCOX is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

RPT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RPT is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RPT is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RPT is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RPT is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RPT is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RPT is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLCOX vs. RPT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) and RPT Realty (RPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLCOX, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.69-0.92
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLCOX, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.39-1.26
The chart of Omega ratio for FLCOX, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.300.85
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLCOX, currently valued at 2.40, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.40-0.55
The chart of Martin ratio for FLCOX, currently valued at 7.28, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.007.28-1.08
FLCOX
RPT

The current FLCOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the RPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCOX and RPT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.69
-0.92
FLCOX
RPT

Dividends

FLCOX vs. RPT - Dividend Comparison

FLCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than RPT's 9.72% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
1.58%1.62%1.99%2.01%1.55%2.28%2.13%2.33%1.73%0.52%0.00%
RPT
RPT Realty
9.72%9.43%14.34%16.00%6.16%7.93%8.98%10.12%8.18%7.46%5.28%

Drawdowns

FLCOX vs. RPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCOX drawdown since its inception was -38.28%, smaller than the maximum RPT drawdown of -74.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCOX and RPT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-4.54%
-72.38%
FLCOX
RPT

Volatility

FLCOX vs. RPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) is 4.25%, while RPT Realty (RPT) has a volatility of 13.11%. This indicates that FLCOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.25%
13.11%
FLCOX
RPT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab