FLCH vs. BND
FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLCH returned -4.99%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BND. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLCH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
FLCH vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -6.60% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 0.41% return.
FLCH
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- YTD
- -6.60%
- 6M
- -7.51%
- 1Y
- 5.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.54%
- 5Y*
- -4.99%
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
FLCH vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -6.60% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.41% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCH and BND is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.01 |
The correlation between FLCH and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCH vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
FLCH
BND
FLCH vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCH | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.22 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 1.73 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | 5.21 | -4.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCH | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 1.24 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.02 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.59 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
FLCH vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCH | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.09% | -18.58% | -43.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -2.68% | -12.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | -5.92% | -19.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.78% | -17.91% | -37.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.16% | -2.23% | -31.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.53% | -3.06% | -27.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.43% | 0.89% | +6.54% |
Volatility
FLCH vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.22%. This indicates that FLCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCH | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 1.22% | +5.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.67% | 2.66% | +11.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.20% | 3.78% | +15.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.59% | 6.02% | +23.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.91% | 5.53% | +22.38% |
FLCH vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLCH vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than BND's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.53% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCH and BND have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCH has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to BND (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCH dropped -62.09% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 5-year performance, BND leads with 0.11% vs -4.99% for FLCH. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BND has performed better with a 0.11% return vs -4.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLCH.
BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 2.53% for FLCH.
FLCH is categorized as China Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLCH and 0.03% for BND.
BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCH and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer