FLCA vs. SCHH
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH).
FLCA and SCHH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLCA is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. SCHH is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. It was launched on Jan 13, 2011. Both FLCA and SCHH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLCA or SCHH.
Correlation
The correlation between FLCA and SCHH is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FLCA vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FLCA:
0.92
SCHH:
0.67
FLCA:
1.41
SCHH:
1.09
FLCA:
1.19
SCHH:
1.14
FLCA:
1.28
SCHH:
0.57
FLCA:
5.02
SCHH:
2.22
FLCA:
3.20%
SCHH:
5.84%
FLCA:
16.95%
SCHH:
17.76%
FLCA:
-41.51%
SCHH:
-44.22%
FLCA:
-0.33%
SCHH:
-11.37%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCA achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly higher than SCHH's 1.23% return.
FLCA
6.50%
7.65%
4.17%
15.47%
15.00%
N/A
SCHH
1.23%
5.78%
-4.97%
11.81%
7.15%
3.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLCA vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCA has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLCA vs. SCHH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FLCA
SCHH
FLCA vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLCA vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison
FLCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than SCHH's 3.16% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCA Franklin FTSE Canada ETF | 2.34% | 2.50% | 2.49% | 2.20% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 3.02% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 3.16% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.66% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% | 2.18% |
Drawdowns
FLCA vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCA drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, smaller than the maximum SCHH drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCA and SCHH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLCA vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) have volatilities of 4.71% and 4.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.