PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLBR vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLBR vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLBR achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 9.50% return.


FLBR

1D
0.84%
1M
-6.09%
YTD
13.23%
6M
14.68%
1Y
32.65%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*

VWO

1D
-0.29%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
9.50%
6M
9.67%
1Y
22.86%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLBR vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
13.23%45.57%-27.58%33.19%10.44%-16.78%-20.13%28.47%-2.13%2.27%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
9.50%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FLBR and VWO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.59

The correlation between FLBR and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLBR vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLBR
VWO

Financial Services

25.6%
16.8%

Energy

19.3%
3.6%

Basic Materials

16.5%
7.0%

Utilities

13.7%
2.4%

Industrials

11.6%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
3.1%

Healthcare

2.8%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
8.7%

Communication Services

1.9%
5.8%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.8%

Technology

0.8%
31.6%

Financial Services

FLBR
25.6%
VWO
16.8%

Energy

FLBR
19.3%
VWO
3.6%

Basic Materials

FLBR
16.5%
VWO
7.0%

Utilities

FLBR
13.7%
VWO
2.4%

Industrials

FLBR
11.6%
VWO
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

FLBR
4.6%
VWO
3.1%

Healthcare

FLBR
2.8%
VWO
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FLBR
2.6%
VWO
8.7%

Communication Services

FLBR
1.9%
VWO
5.8%

Real Estate

FLBR
0.8%
VWO
1.8%

Technology

FLBR
0.8%
VWO
31.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLBR vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLBR
FLBR Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FLBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLBR Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FLBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLBR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLBR vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLBRVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.06

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.98

7.20

-2.21

FLBR vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLBR and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLBR vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLBR drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLBR and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLBRVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.42%

-67.68%

+10.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.38%

-11.17%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.97%

-17.37%

-11.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

-32.60%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.23%

-3.98%

-13.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.60%

-15.78%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.57%

3.18%

+3.39%

Volatility

FLBR vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) is 6.24%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that FLBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLBRVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

7.06%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

14.60%

+5.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.34%

16.82%

+8.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.70%

17.58%

+10.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.00%

19.17%

+13.83%

FLBR vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLBR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLBR vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

FLBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than VWO's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
4.79%7.71%7.68%8.84%11.99%8.71%2.32%3.42%3.72%0.42%0.00%0.00%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.35%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLBR and VWO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to FLBR (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLBR dropped -57.42% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 5-year performance, FLBR leads with 5.13% vs 4.72% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FLBR has been the lower-risk option at 6.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLBR has performed better with a 5.13% return vs 4.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLBR.

FLBR has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 2.35% for VWO.

FLBR is categorized as Latin America Equities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. FLBR tracks FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLBR and 0.08% for VWO.

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLBR and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer