FLAX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FLAX is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Feb 6, 2018. FSPSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLAX or FSPSX.
Performance
FLAX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLAX achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's 4.83% return.
FLAX
11.44%
-5.23%
2.69%
13.70%
4.16%
N/A
FSPSX
4.83%
-5.36%
-3.06%
11.02%
5.91%
5.14%
Key characteristics
FLAX | FSPSX | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 0.91 | 0.92 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.37 | 1.34 |
Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 1.16 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.46 | 1.30 |
Martin Ratio | 4.15 | 4.16 |
Ulcer Index | 3.62% | 2.76% |
Daily Std Dev | 16.50% | 12.47% |
Max Drawdown | -42.51% | -33.69% |
Current Drawdown | -19.26% | -8.29% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLAX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between FLAX and FSPSX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLAX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLAX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than FSPSX's 3.03% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF | 2.78% | 2.20% | 2.86% | 2.39% | 1.58% | 2.23% | 2.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.03% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.36% | 2.99% | 2.79% | 3.53% | 2.59% |
Drawdowns
FLAX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -42.51%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and FSPSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLAX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 3.79%. This indicates that FLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.