PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAPX vs. VTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLAPX vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund (FLAPX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAPX achieves a 15.80% return, which is significantly lower than VTWO's 20.53% return.


FLAPX

1D
0.16%
1M
2.43%
YTD
15.80%
6M
13.68%
1Y
28.69%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*

VTWO

1D
-0.94%
1M
3.85%
YTD
20.53%
6M
17.73%
1Y
41.24%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
11.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAPX vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLAPX
Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund
15.80%14.33%15.30%17.28%-17.28%22.59%17.30%30.56%-9.10%14.01%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
20.53%12.90%11.55%17.08%-20.49%14.79%20.22%25.81%-11.15%13.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAPX and VTWO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017

0.93

The correlation between FLAPX and VTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLAPX vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAPX
FLAPX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FLAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAPX vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund (FLAPX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLAPXVTWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

3.77

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.82

13.36

-0.55

FLAPX vs. VTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the VTWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAPX and VTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLAPX vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAPX drawdown since its inception was -40.31%, roughly equal to the maximum VTWO drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAPX and VTWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAPXVTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.31%

-41.19%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-10.99%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.02%

-27.57%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.09%

-31.88%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.94%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-8.36%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

3.10%

-0.77%

Volatility

FLAPX vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund (FLAPX) is 4.60%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that FLAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLAPXVTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

6.57%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

14.28%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

19.68%

-3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

22.56%

-3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

23.11%

-3.17%

FLAPX vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VTWO's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLAPX vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison

FLAPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLAPX
Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund
0.00%0.00%1.08%1.99%1.82%2.83%2.16%2.18%2.24%0.44%0.00%0.00%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.10%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FLAPX and VTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWO has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to FLAPX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAPX dropped -40.31% vs VTWO's -41.19%.

VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLAPX and VTWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer