PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FL vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FL and QQQ is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

FL vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Foot Locker, Inc. (FL) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-19.88%
2.07%
FL
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FL:

-0.50

QQQ:

1.34

Sortino Ratio

FL:

-0.36

QQQ:

1.83

Omega Ratio

FL:

0.95

QQQ:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

FL:

-0.43

QQQ:

1.78

Martin Ratio

FL:

-1.02

QQQ:

6.25

Ulcer Index

FL:

28.38%

QQQ:

3.86%

Daily Std Dev

FL:

58.34%

QQQ:

18.07%

Max Drawdown

FL:

-88.62%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

FL:

-66.75%

QQQ:

-6.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FL achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -1.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FL has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of -6.34%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.47% annualized return.


FL

YTD

-4.27%

1M

-4.45%

6M

-19.88%

1Y

-27.09%

5Y*

-9.45%

10Y*

-6.34%

QQQ

YTD

-1.20%

1M

-4.64%

6M

2.07%

1Y

24.06%

5Y*

18.68%

10Y*

18.47%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FL vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FL is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FL is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FL is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FL is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FL is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FL is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FL vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Foot Locker, Inc. (FL) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FL, currently valued at -0.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.501.34
The chart of Sortino ratio for FL, currently valued at -0.36, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.361.83
The chart of Omega ratio for FL, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.951.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for FL, currently valued at -0.43, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.431.78
The chart of Martin ratio for FL, currently valued at -1.02, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-1.026.25
FL
QQQ

The current FL Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FL and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.50
1.34
FL
QQQ

Dividends

FL vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

FL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FL
Foot Locker, Inc.
0.00%0.00%5.14%3.97%1.95%2.30%3.81%2.53%2.57%1.52%1.49%1.53%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.56%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

FL vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FL drawdown since its inception was -88.62%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FL and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-66.75%
-6.00%
FL
QQQ

Volatility

FL vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Foot Locker, Inc. (FL) has a higher volatility of 10.71% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 5.94%. This indicates that FL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
10.71%
5.94%
FL
QQQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab