FL vs. NICE

In the year-to-date period, FL achieves a -28.06% return, which is significantly lower than NICE's -11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FL has underperformed NICE with an annualized return of -6.16%, while NICE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Foot Locker, Inc. (FL) and NICE Ltd. (NICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FL Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the NICE Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FL and NICE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FL nor NICE has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FL drawdown since its inception was -88.62%, roughly equal to the maximum NICE drawdown of -93.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FL and NICE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Foot Locker, Inc. (FL) has a higher volatility of 14.82% compared to NICE Ltd. (NICE) at 11.44%. This indicates that FL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Foot Locker, Inc. and NICE Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.