PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FL vs. MA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FLMA
YTD Return-20.22%22.13%
1Y Return18.73%33.66%
3Y Return (Ann)-19.71%14.70%
5Y Return (Ann)-9.12%14.18%
10Y Return (Ann)-5.11%20.61%
Sharpe Ratio0.242.17
Sortino Ratio0.782.85
Omega Ratio1.111.40
Calmar Ratio0.222.87
Martin Ratio0.617.16
Ulcer Index24.42%4.74%
Daily Std Dev62.63%15.67%
Max Drawdown-88.62%-62.67%
Current Drawdown-60.33%-0.62%

Fundamentals


FLMA
Market Cap$2.33B$478.31B
EPS-$3.89$13.65
PEG Ratio-71.361.91
Total Revenue (TTM)$6.16B$27.23B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.56B$25.03B
EBITDA (TTM)$239.00M$15.99B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between FL and MA is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FL vs. MA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FL achieves a -20.22% return, which is significantly lower than MA's 22.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FL has underperformed MA with an annualized return of -5.11%, while MA has yielded a comparatively higher 20.61% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.18%
14.02%
FL
MA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FL vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Foot Locker, Inc. (FL) and Mastercard Inc (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FL, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.24
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FL, currently valued at 0.78, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.78
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FL, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FL, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FL, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.61
MA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MA, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.17
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MA, currently valued at 2.85, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.85
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MA, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MA, currently valued at 2.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.87
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MA, currently valued at 7.16, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.007.16

FL vs. MA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FL Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the MA Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FL and MA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.24
2.17
FL
MA

Dividends

FL vs. MA - Dividend Comparison

FL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FL
Foot Locker, Inc.
0.00%5.14%3.97%1.95%2.30%3.81%2.53%2.57%1.52%1.49%1.53%1.88%
MA
Mastercard Inc
0.51%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%0.51%0.25%

Drawdowns

FL vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FL drawdown since its inception was -88.62%, which is greater than MA's maximum drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FL and MA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-60.33%
-0.62%
FL
MA

Volatility

FL vs. MA - Volatility Comparison

Foot Locker, Inc. (FL) has a higher volatility of 9.42% compared to Mastercard Inc (MA) at 5.31%. This indicates that FL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.42%
5.31%
FL
MA

Financials

FL vs. MA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Foot Locker, Inc. and Mastercard Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items