PortfoliosLab logo
FKWL vs. IMMR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FKWL and IMMR is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FKWL vs. IMMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Wireless Corp. (FKWL) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FKWL:

1.36

IMMR:

-0.13

Sortino Ratio

FKWL:

2.02

IMMR:

0.43

Omega Ratio

FKWL:

1.27

IMMR:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

FKWL:

0.66

IMMR:

0.04

Martin Ratio

FKWL:

5.20

IMMR:

0.11

Ulcer Index

FKWL:

11.31%

IMMR:

32.11%

Daily Std Dev

FKWL:

44.02%

IMMR:

43.98%

Max Drawdown

FKWL:

-95.71%

IMMR:

-98.66%

Current Drawdown

FKWL:

-81.53%

IMMR:

-89.23%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FKWL:

$55.39M

IMMR:

$235.85M

EPS

FKWL:

-$0.19

IMMR:

$1.80

PEG Ratio

FKWL:

0.00

IMMR:

-0.45

PS Ratio

FKWL:

1.27

IMMR:

1.45

PB Ratio

FKWL:

1.51

IMMR:

0.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

FKWL:

$37.27M

IMMR:

$1.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FKWL:

$5.95M

IMMR:

$315.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

FKWL:

-$1.22M

IMMR:

$160.51M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKWL achieves a -4.08% return, which is significantly higher than IMMR's -13.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FKWL has outperformed IMMR with an annualized return of 14.53%, while IMMR has yielded a comparatively lower -4.21% annualized return.


FKWL

YTD

-4.08%

1M

-8.20%

6M

10.59%

1Y

59.32%

5Y*

-3.59%

10Y*

14.53%

IMMR

YTD

-13.53%

1M

4.66%

6M

-15.56%

1Y

-8.15%

5Y*

2.68%

10Y*

-4.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FKWL vs. IMMR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKWL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FKWL is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FKWL is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FKWL is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FKWL is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FKWL is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FKWL is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IMMR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IMMR is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IMMR is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IMMR is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IMMR is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IMMR is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IMMR is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FKWL vs. IMMR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Wireless Corp. (FKWL) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FKWL Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the IMMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKWL and IMMR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FKWL vs. IMMR - Dividend Comparison

FKWL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%.


TTM20242023
FKWL
Franklin Wireless Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
5.22%2.06%1.70%

Drawdowns

FKWL vs. IMMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKWL drawdown since its inception was -95.71%, roughly equal to the maximum IMMR drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKWL and IMMR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FKWL vs. IMMR - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Wireless Corp. (FKWL) has a higher volatility of 10.54% compared to Immersion Corporation (IMMR) at 8.38%. This indicates that FKWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FKWL vs. IMMR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franklin Wireless Corp. and Immersion Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
17.83M
474.76M
(FKWL) Total Revenue
(IMMR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FKWL vs. IMMR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Franklin Wireless Corp. and Immersion Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
18.2%
22.3%
(FKWL) Gross Margin
(IMMR) Gross Margin
FKWL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Franklin Wireless Corp. reported a gross profit of 3.24M and revenue of 17.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.

IMMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Immersion Corporation reported a gross profit of 105.82M and revenue of 474.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.3%.

FKWL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Franklin Wireless Corp. reported an operating income of 795.23K and revenue of 17.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

IMMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Immersion Corporation reported an operating income of 26.21M and revenue of 474.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.5%.

FKWL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Franklin Wireless Corp. reported a net income of 228.74K and revenue of 17.83M, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.

IMMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Immersion Corporation reported a net income of 15.47M and revenue of 474.76M, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.