FKIDX vs. FNWFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FKIDX (Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund) and FNWFX (American Funds New World Fund Class F-3) are both mutual funds - FKIDX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FNWFX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 5 years, FKIDX returned 8.62%/yr vs 7.52%/yr for FNWFX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FKIDX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for FNWFX.

Performance

FKIDX vs. FNWFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund (FKIDX) and American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKIDX achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly lower than FNWFX's 18.20% return.

FKIDX

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: 4.90%
• YTD: 14.73%
• 6M: 15.31%
• 1Y: 28.04%
• 3Y*: 17.08%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: —

FNWFX

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: 5.04%
• YTD: 18.20%
• 6M: 19.12%
• 1Y: 36.94%
• 3Y*: 18.74%
• 5Y*: 7.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKIDX vs. FNWFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FKIDX Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund	14.73%	27.92%	6.58%	17.57%	-23.30%	13.35%	19.41%	29.76%	-15.21%	8.61%
FNWFX American Funds New World Fund Class F-3	18.20%	28.67%	6.88%	16.24%	-21.77%	5.09%	25.30%	28.02%	-12.00%	14.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FKIDX and FNWFX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017	0.88

The correlation between FKIDX and FNWFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FKIDX vs. FNWFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKIDX

FKIDX Risk / Return Rank: 35
FKIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FKIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FKIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FKIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
FKIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FNWFX

FNWFX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FNWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FNWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FNWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FNWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
FNWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKIDX vs. FNWFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund (FKIDX) and American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FKIDX	FNWFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	2.24	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	3.05	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.43	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	2.80	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.53	11.19	-2.65

FKIDX vs. FNWFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the FNWFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKIDX and FNWFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FKIDX vs. FNWFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKIDX drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, roughly equal to the maximum FNWFX drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKIDX and FNWFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FKIDX	FNWFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.00%	-33.40%	-1.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.45%	-13.00%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.48%	-15.00%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.00%	-33.40%	-1.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.16%	-8.65%	+0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	3.24%	-0.04%

Volatility

FKIDX vs. FNWFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund (FKIDX) is 6.96%, while American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that FKIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNWFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FKIDX	FNWFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.96%	7.65%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.43%	14.31%	+1.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.91%	16.19%	+1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.33%	15.72%	+1.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.31%	16.51%	+0.80%

FKIDX vs. FNWFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKIDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FNWFX's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

FKIDX vs. FNWFX - Dividend Comparison

FKIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than FNWFX's 5.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FKIDX Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund	1.92%	2.21%	2.22%	1.55%	0.84%	0.97%	0.61%	1.57%	1.38%	0.19%
FNWFX American Funds New World Fund Class F-3	5.15%	6.09%	4.10%	2.88%	1.33%	7.32%	0.43%	4.04%	2.70%	2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FKIDX and FNWFX in my portfolio?

FKIDX and FNWFX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FKIDX or FNWFX?

FNWFX has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to FKIDX (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKIDX dropped -35.00% vs FNWFX's -33.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNWFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.