PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FKDNX vs. TRLGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FKDNXTRLGX
YTD Return31.71%31.83%
1Y Return46.70%39.47%
3Y Return (Ann)0.90%4.38%
5Y Return (Ann)16.06%15.02%
10Y Return (Ann)13.89%11.55%
Sharpe Ratio2.242.53
Sortino Ratio2.893.33
Omega Ratio1.401.46
Calmar Ratio1.511.74
Martin Ratio12.4115.36
Ulcer Index3.82%2.60%
Daily Std Dev21.20%15.82%
Max Drawdown-55.85%-56.16%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between FKDNX and TRLGX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FKDNX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FKDNX having a 31.71% return and TRLGX slightly higher at 31.83%. Over the past 10 years, FKDNX has outperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 13.89%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.55% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.08%
16.73%
FKDNX
TRLGX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FKDNX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKDNX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
Expense ratio chart for FKDNX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%
Expense ratio chart for TRLGX: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FKDNX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKDNX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FKDNX, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.24
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FKDNX, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FKDNX, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FKDNX, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.51
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FKDNX, currently valued at 12.41, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.41
TRLGX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 3.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 15.36, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0015.36

FKDNX vs. TRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKDNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKDNX and TRLGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.24
2.53
FKDNX
TRLGX

Dividends

FKDNX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FKDNX nor TRLGX has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.41%0.28%0.24%0.24%0.03%0.07%0.04%

Drawdowns

FKDNX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKDNX drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, roughly equal to the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -56.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKDNX and TRLGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
FKDNX
TRLGX

Volatility

FKDNX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) at 4.73%. This indicates that FKDNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.27%
4.73%
FKDNX
TRLGX