FKDNX vs. TRLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX).
FKDNX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 2, 1968. TRLGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 31, 2001.
Performance
FKDNX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FKDNX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund | -10.96% | 18.59% | 30.57% | 44.42% | -40.30% | 12.53% | 57.68% | 36.36% | 2.85% | 39.29% |
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | -11.46% | 17.51% | 37.57% | 46.22% | -35.26% | 23.24% | 39.57% | 28.51% | 4.35% | 37.77% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FKDNX having a -10.96% return and TRLGX slightly lower at -11.46%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FKDNX having a 15.95% annualized return and TRLGX not far ahead at 16.72%.
FKDNX
- 1D
- 5.05%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- -10.96%
- 6M
- -11.72%
- 1Y
- 19.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 15.95%
TRLGX
- 1D
- 3.95%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- -11.46%
- 6M
- -10.30%
- 1Y
- 12.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 16.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FKDNX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FKDNX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FKDNX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank
FKDNX
TRLGX
FKDNX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FKDNX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 0.59 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 1.02 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.14 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 0.55 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | 1.83 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FKDNX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.59 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.43 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.77 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.55 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FKDNX and TRLGX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FKDNX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison
FKDNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.54%, less than TRLGX's 15.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund | 12.54% | 11.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.92% | 1.77% | 3.55% | 2.46% |
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | 15.46% | 13.69% | 9.80% | 2.04% | 3.88% | 2.56% | 0.42% | 4.09% | 7.93% | 9.27% | 1.64% | 4.71% |
Drawdowns
FKDNX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FKDNX drawdown since its inception was -51.63%, smaller than the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKDNX and TRLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FKDNX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.63% | -55.56% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.49% | -18.18% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.28% | -40.44% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | -40.44% | -7.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.48% | -14.94% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.28% | -8.71% | -2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | 5.43% | +0.86% |
Volatility
FKDNX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) at 7.19%. This indicates that FKDNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FKDNX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | 7.19% | +2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.81% | 12.51% | +4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.47% | 22.17% | +4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 22.41% | +3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 21.73% | +2.80% |