Correlation
The correlation between FKDNX and SCHG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
FKDNX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
FKDNX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 2, 1968. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FKDNX or SCHG.
Performance
FKDNX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FKDNX:
0.39
SCHG:
0.56
FKDNX:
0.75
SCHG:
0.90
FKDNX:
1.10
SCHG:
1.12
FKDNX:
0.45
SCHG:
0.57
FKDNX:
1.41
SCHG:
1.88
FKDNX:
8.34%
SCHG:
7.10%
FKDNX:
29.56%
SCHG:
25.28%
FKDNX:
-55.85%
SCHG:
-34.59%
FKDNX:
-6.50%
SCHG:
-7.26%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FKDNX achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FKDNX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 14.74%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.64% annualized return.
FKDNX
-0.58%
11.35%
-0.64%
10.85%
20.50%
12.02%
14.74%
SCHG
-3.17%
8.23%
-1.72%
12.91%
22.94%
18.22%
15.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FKDNX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FKDNX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FKDNX vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FKDNX
SCHG
FKDNX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FKDNX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FKDNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.92% | 1.77% | 3.55% | 2.46% | 3.50% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
FKDNX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FKDNX drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKDNX and SCHG.
Loading data...
Volatility
FKDNX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.48%. This indicates that FKDNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...