PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJSCX vs. DBJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJSCX vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund (FJSCX) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJSCX achieves a 20.14% return, which is significantly higher than DBJP's 19.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FJSCX has underperformed DBJP with an annualized return of 8.71%, while DBJP has yielded a comparatively higher 16.78% annualized return.


FJSCX

1D
4.24%
1M
-2.18%
6M
13.26%
YTD
20.14%
1Y
26.31%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
8.71%
ALL TIME*
6.26%

DBJP

1D
-0.85%
1M
-1.87%
6M
13.49%
YTD
19.08%
1Y
45.39%
3Y*
26.50%
5Y*
21.84%
10Y*
16.78%
ALL TIME*
13.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.67M$5.11M$4.76M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FJSCX vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FJSCX
Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund
20.14%26.43%8.03%15.15%-14.49%-0.36%4.80%22.00%-15.98%34.56%
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
19.08%29.51%25.53%36.21%-4.19%13.04%10.53%20.87%-14.82%21.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FJSCX and DBJP is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011

0.59

The correlation between FJSCX and DBJP shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJSCX vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FJSCX
FJSCX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FJSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FJSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DBJP
DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FJSCX vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund (FJSCX) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FJSCXDBJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.38

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

4.16

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.86

14.40

-7.54

FJSCX vs. DBJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the DBJP Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJSCX and DBJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FJSCX vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJSCX drawdown since its inception was -71.42%, which is greater than DBJP's maximum drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJSCX and DBJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJSCXDBJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.42%

-31.30%

-40.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-10.39%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.08%

-21.50%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.74%

-21.50%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.10%

-31.30%

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.45%

-5.87%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.53%

-7.25%

-19.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

3.00%

+1.06%

Volatility

FJSCX vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund (FJSCX) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) at 6.41%. This indicates that FJSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJSCXDBJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

6.41%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.94%

15.94%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.17%

20.03%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.98%

19.24%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

19.27%

-2.94%

FJSCX vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJSCX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJSCX vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison

FJSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.66%, more than DBJP's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
1.27%2.81%2.80%5.21%0.80%2.30%2.53%2.56%3.87%2.07%1.13%5.95%
FJSCX
Fidelity Japan Smaller Companies Fund
14.66%17.62%4.54%2.82%0.05%12.01%1.59%7.13%5.55%3.91%2.83%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


FJSCX and DBJP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FJSCX has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to DBJP (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJSCX dropped -71.42% vs DBJP's -31.30%.

DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJSCX and DBJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer