PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIW vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIW vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIW achieves a -3.78% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FIW has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.18%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


FIW

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
-3.78%
6M
-6.34%
1Y
-2.02%
3Y*
7.84%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
12.18%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIW vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIW
First Trust Water ETF
-3.78%7.20%8.38%20.35%-15.70%32.00%21.15%37.37%-9.23%24.69%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FIW and VOO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.80

The correlation between FIW and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FIW vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIW
VOO

Industrials

54.1%
8.3%

Utilities

16.2%
2.4%

Healthcare

8.1%
8.5%

Technology

8.1%
35.7%

Basic Materials

5.4%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.9%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Industrials

FIW
54.1%
VOO
8.3%

Utilities

FIW
16.2%
VOO
2.4%

Healthcare

FIW
8.1%
VOO
8.5%

Technology

FIW
8.1%
VOO
35.7%

Basic Materials

FIW
5.4%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FIW
2.7%
VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

FIW
2.7%
VOO
4.9%

Communication Services

FIW

-

VOO
11.3%

Energy

FIW

-

VOO
3.5%

Financial Services

FIW

-

VOO
11.6%

Real Estate

FIW

-

VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIW vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIW
FIW Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIW Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIW vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIWVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.13

2.39

-2.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.08

3.25

-3.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.43

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

3.16

-3.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.38

14.73

-15.11

FIW vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIW and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIWVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

2.39

-2.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.83

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.87

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.89

-0.46

Drawdowns

FIW vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIW drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIW and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.75%

-33.99%

-18.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.81%

-8.90%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.32%

-18.69%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.53%

-24.52%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.60%

-33.99%

-2.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.76%

-0.70%

-9.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-3.69%

-4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

1.91%

+3.42%

Volatility

FIW vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Water ETF (FIW) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that FIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

2.84%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.42%

8.90%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.50%

11.80%

+3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

16.81%

+1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

18.01%

+1.89%

FIW vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIW has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIW vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIW
First Trust Water ETF
0.79%0.69%0.69%0.68%0.67%0.37%0.56%0.55%0.73%1.13%0.51%0.76%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIW and VOO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIW has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIW dropped -52.75% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 12.18% for FIW. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 12.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for FIW.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.79% for FIW.

FIW is categorized as Water Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FIW tracks ISE Clean Edge Water Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for FIW and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIW and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer