FIW vs. EBLU
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU).
FIW and EBLU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FIW is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the ISE Clean Edge Water Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007. EBLU is a passively managed fund by Tortoise that tracks the performance of the Ecofin Water ESG Index. It was launched on Feb 15, 2017. Both FIW and EBLU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FIW vs. EBLU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIW vs. EBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIW First Trust Water ETF | -3.98% | 7.20% | 8.38% | 20.35% | -15.70% | 32.00% | 21.15% | 37.37% | -9.23% | 18.42% |
EBLU Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund | 0.43% | 11.82% | 8.54% | 20.95% | -25.99% | 28.93% | 15.74% | 38.72% | -12.80% | 20.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIW achieves a -3.98% return, which is significantly lower than EBLU's 0.43% return.
FIW
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -7.88%
- YTD
- -3.98%
- 6M
- -7.06%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 8.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- 12.89%
EBLU
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -8.21%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- 11.49%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIW vs. EBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIW has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than EBLU's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIW vs. EBLU — Risk / Return Rank
FIW
EBLU
FIW vs. EBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIW | EBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 0.67 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | 1.10 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.14 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 0.86 | -0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.04 | 2.79 | -1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIW | EBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 0.67 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.34 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.52 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIW and EBLU is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIW vs. EBLU - Dividend Comparison
FIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than EBLU's 3.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIW First Trust Water ETF | 0.79% | 0.69% | 0.69% | 0.68% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% | 0.55% | 0.73% | 1.13% | 0.51% | 0.76% |
EBLU Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund | 3.29% | 3.31% | 1.34% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.55% | 1.42% | 1.58% | 1.35% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FIW vs. EBLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIW drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, which is greater than EBLU's maximum drawdown of -37.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIW and EBLU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIW | EBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.75% | -37.58% | -15.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.74% | -13.17% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.53% | -35.36% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.95% | -9.47% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.29% | -8.13% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 4.07% | -0.06% |
Volatility
FIW vs. EBLU - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and Ecofin Global Water ESG Fund (EBLU) have volatilities of 5.83% and 5.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIW | EBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 5.83% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.03% | 10.60% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 17.19% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 17.20% | +1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 19.00% | +0.88% |