FIVN vs. RNG
FIVN (Five9, Inc.) and RNG (RingCentral, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — FIVN in Software - Infrastructure, RNG in Software - Application. Over the past 10 years, FIVN returned 8.08%/yr vs 9.33%/yr for RNG. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
FIVN vs. RNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIVN achieves a 37.21% return, which is significantly lower than RNG's 93.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FIVN has underperformed RNG with an annualized return of 8.08%, while RNG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.33% annualized return.
FIVN
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 17.36%
- 6M
- 55.78%
- YTD
- 37.21%
- 1Y
- 13.30%
- 3Y*
- -32.05%
- 5Y*
- -32.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.60%
RNG
- 1D
- 4.00%
- 1M
- 39.02%
- 6M
- 115.63%
- YTD
- 93.23%
- 1Y
- 136.16%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- -26.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FIVN Five9, Inc. | $110.43M | $79.57M | $76.87M |
| $166.64M | $110.87M | $87.41M |
FIVN vs. RNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVN Five9, Inc. | 37.21% | -50.66% | -48.35% | 15.96% | -50.58% | -21.26% | 165.93% | 50.00% | 75.72% | 75.33% |
RNG RingCentral, Inc. | 93.23% | -17.51% | 3.12% | -4.10% | -81.10% | -50.56% | 124.68% | 104.60% | 70.33% | 134.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIVN and RNG is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2014 | 0.57 |
The correlation between FIVN and RNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FIVN:
$2.11B
RNG:
$4.80B
FIVN:
$0.66
RNG:
$1.25
FIVN:
41.74
RNG:
44.65
FIVN:
2.03
RNG:
1.91
FIVN:
$1.17B
RNG:
$2.58B
FIVN:
$644.83M
RNG:
$1.86B
FIVN:
$179.58M
RNG:
$300.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIVN vs. RNG — Risk / Return Rank
FIVN
RNG
FIVN vs. RNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Five9, Inc. (FIVN) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIVN | RNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.33 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 4.08 | -3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.24 | 9.42 | -9.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIVN vs. RNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIVN drawdown since its inception was -93.51%, roughly equal to the maximum RNG drawdown of -95.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVN and RNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIVN | RNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.51% | -95.15% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.63% | -29.32% | -21.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.08% | -48.57% | -35.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.51% | -92.36% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.51% | -95.15% | +1.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.88% | -87.41% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.92% | -42.86% | +6.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.99% | 12.69% | +14.30% |
Volatility
FIVN vs. RNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Five9, Inc. (FIVN) is 19.04%, while RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) has a volatility of 28.56%. This indicates that FIVN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIVN | RNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.04% | 28.56% | -9.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.55% | 59.45% | -7.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.94% | 75.16% | -11.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.57% | 64.53% | -7.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.34% | 56.51% | -5.17% |
Dividends
FIVN vs. RNG - Dividend Comparison
FIVN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
FIVN Five9, Inc. | 0.00% |
RNG RingCentral, Inc. | 0.27% |
Financials
FIVN vs. RNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Five9, Inc. and RingCentral, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FIVN vs. RNG - Profitability Comparison
FIVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Five9, Inc. reported a gross profit of 170.53M and revenue of 305.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.
RNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported a gross profit of 472.31M and revenue of 657.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.9%.
FIVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Five9, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.49M and revenue of 305.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.
RNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.29M and revenue of 657.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.
FIVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Five9, Inc. reported a net income of 18.41M and revenue of 305.32M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
RNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported a net income of 39.12M and revenue of 657.01M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FIVN and RNG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNG has higher volatility (28.56%) compared to FIVN (19.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVN dropped -93.51% vs RNG's -95.15%.
RNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIVN and RNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer