FIVN vs. RNG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Five9, Inc. (FIVN) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG).

Performance

FIVN vs. RNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Five9, Inc. (FIVN) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FIVN vs. RNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIVN Five9, Inc.	-24.34%	-50.66%	-48.35%	15.96%	-50.58%	-21.26%	165.93%	50.00%	75.72%	75.33%
RNG RingCentral, Inc.	29.00%	-17.51%	3.12%	-4.10%	-81.10%	-50.56%	124.68%	104.60%	70.33%	134.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FIVN : $1.32B RNG : $3.27B
EPS FIVN : $0.45 RNG : $0.48
PE Ratio FIVN : 33.82 RNG : 77.93
PS Ratio FIVN : 1.16 RNG : 1.34
Total Revenue (TTM) FIVN : $1.15B RNG : $2.52B
Gross Profit (TTM) FIVN : $632.85M RNG : $1.79B
EBITDA (TTM) FIVN : $104.98M RNG : $331.71M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVN achieves a -24.34% return, which is significantly lower than RNG's 29.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FIVN has underperformed RNG with an annualized return of 5.36%, while RNG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.86% annualized return.

FIVN

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: -13.02%
• YTD: -24.34%
• 6M: -37.31%
• 1Y: -44.13%
• 3Y*: -40.58%
• 5Y*: -37.90%
• 10Y*: 5.36%

RNG

• 1D: 2.68%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 29.00%
• 6M: 31.46%
• 1Y: 50.47%
• 3Y*: 6.70%
• 5Y*: -34.33%
• 10Y*: 8.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FIVN vs. RNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVN

FIVN Risk / Return Rank: 9
FIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 12
FIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 5

RNG

RNG Risk / Return Rank: 73
RNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
RNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
RNG Omega Ratio Rank: 71
RNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RNG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVN vs. RNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Five9, Inc. (FIVN) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIVN	RNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.81	0.79	-1.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.13	1.76	-2.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.22	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	1.95	-2.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.74	4.34	-6.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIVN vs. RNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVN Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the RNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVN and RNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIVN	RNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.81	0.79	-1.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.71	-0.55	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	0.16	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.11	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between FIVN and RNG is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FIVN vs. RNG - Dividend Comparison

FIVN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.

	TTM
FIVN Five9, Inc.	0.00%
RNG RingCentral, Inc.	0.20%

Drawdowns

FIVN vs. RNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVN drawdown since its inception was -93.12%, roughly equal to the maximum RNG drawdown of -95.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVN and RNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIVN	RNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.12%	-95.15%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.18%	-23.49%	-27.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.12%	-93.49%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.12%	-95.15%	+2.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.77%	-91.60%	-1.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.40%	-41.60%	+7.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.12%	10.52%	+15.60%

Volatility

FIVN vs. RNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Five9, Inc. (FIVN) is 13.69%, while RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) has a volatility of 15.68%. This indicates that FIVN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIVN	RNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.69%	15.68%	-1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.14%	46.78%	-7.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.59%	64.68%	-10.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.56%	62.12%	-8.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.97%	54.96%	-4.99%

Financials

FIVN vs. RNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Five9, Inc. and RingCentral, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FIVN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Five9, Inc. reported a gross profit of 168.83M and revenue of 300.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.2%.

RNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported a gross profit of 460.53M and revenue of 644.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.

FIVN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Five9, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.18M and revenue of 300.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

RNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported an operating income of 42.44M and revenue of 644.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.

FIVN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Five9, Inc. reported a net income of 19.71M and revenue of 300.28M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.

RNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported a net income of 22.97M and revenue of 644.03M, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.