FIVN vs. RNG

In the year-to-date period, FIVN achieves a -47.00% return, which is significantly lower than RNG's -38.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FIVN has outperformed RNG with an annualized return of 15.09%, while RNG has yielded a comparatively lower 2.63% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Five9, Inc. (FIVN) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FIVN Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is lower than the RNG Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVN and RNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FIVN nor RNG has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FIVN drawdown since its inception was -89.73%, smaller than the maximum RNG drawdown of -95.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVN and RNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Five9, Inc. (FIVN) has a higher volatility of 16.13% compared to RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) at 13.67%. This indicates that FIVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Five9, Inc. and RingCentral, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.