PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVN vs. CDNS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FIVN vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Five9, Inc. (FIVN) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVN achieves a 19.45% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 30.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FIVN has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 7.59%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 32.37% annualized return.


FIVN

1D
-4.31%
1M
2.61%
YTD
19.45%
6M
17.11%
1Y
-13.63%
3Y*
-30.16%
5Y*
-31.25%
10Y*
7.59%

CDNS

1D
-2.01%
1M
16.73%
YTD
30.53%
6M
21.39%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
21.11%
5Y*
26.34%
10Y*
32.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVN vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIVN
Five9, Inc.
19.45%-50.66%-48.35%15.96%-50.58%-21.26%165.93%50.00%75.72%75.33%
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
30.53%4.03%10.31%69.55%-13.80%36.59%96.70%59.52%3.97%65.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVN and CDNS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2014

0.43

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FIVN:

$2.07B

CDNS:

$111.68B

EPS

FIVN:

$0.65

CDNS:

$4.28

PE Ratio

FIVN:

36.59

CDNS:

95.24

PS Ratio

FIVN:

1.78

CDNS:

20.17

PB Ratio

FIVN:

2.49

CDNS:

12.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

FIVN:

$1.17B

CDNS:

$5.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FIVN:

$644.83M

CDNS:

$4.91B

EBITDA (TTM)

FIVN:

$179.58M

CDNS:

$1.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVN vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVN
FIVN Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CDNS
CDNS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CDNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDNS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CDNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDNS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVN vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Five9, Inc. (FIVN) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIVNCDNSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.21

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

1.36

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.45

2.89

-3.34

FIVN vs. CDNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVN Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVN and CDNS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIVNCDNSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

1.04

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.56

0.74

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.96

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.24

-0.05

Drawdowns

FIVN vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVN drawdown since its inception was -93.51%, roughly equal to the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVN and CDNS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVNCDNSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.51%

-93.13%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.96%

-28.85%

-25.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.52%

-29.05%

-55.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.51%

-29.59%

-63.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.51%

-32.12%

-61.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.58%

-2.01%

-86.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-39.65%

+4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.04%

13.58%

+16.46%

Volatility

FIVN vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

Five9, Inc. (FIVN) has a higher volatility of 19.88% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 12.68%. This indicates that FIVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVNCDNSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.88%

12.68%

+7.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.68%

30.56%

+18.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.85%

37.65%

+23.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.75%

35.94%

+19.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.84%

33.97%

+16.87%

Dividends

FIVN vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

Neither FIVN nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FIVN vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Five9, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
305.32M
1.47B
(FIVN) Total Revenue
(CDNS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FIVN vs. CDNS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Five9, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
55.9%
95.9%
Portfolio components
FIVN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Five9, Inc. reported a gross profit of 170.53M and revenue of 305.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.

CDNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

FIVN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Five9, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.49M and revenue of 305.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

CDNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 431.33M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

FIVN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Five9, Inc. reported a net income of 18.41M and revenue of 305.32M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

CDNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 335.66M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FIVN and CDNS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIVN has higher volatility (19.88%) compared to CDNS (12.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVN dropped -93.51% vs CDNS's -93.13%.

CDNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVN and CDNS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer